merge-conflict-resolution

When there's a merge conflict in Git, junk like the following is inserted into the conflicting files. Three questions: How do you read these annotations? What are some strategies to use when fixing these merge conflicts? Is there a GUI tool for Mac that knows how to read these files and display the two versions side-by-side to make it easier to fix the problem? Note: In case it's relevant, I am using GitHub's Mac GUI client. Everything between <<<<<< and ====== comes from the HEAD revision, which is the committed state before starting the merge operation ( git merge will complain if the tree

I'm trying to merge a git branch (test-development) back into master. There are lots of merge conflicts but I want as many as possible to be resolved via --theirs. Is there a way to tell git to merge with --theirs in bulk? Ash Wilson This will do it if you're mid-merge: git merge test-development # Automatic merge failed, a bunch of conflicts! git checkout --theirs ./path git add ./path git commit 来源： https://stackoverflow.com/questions/22544305/git-merge-accept-theirs-for-multiple-conflicts

I have recently observed a very weird merge conflict in Subversion. I am using tortoise SVN as the client. Please find the below information of the Trunk and branch details: \trunk\ . Two users are working on this. \QA\ is the branch where the merges from the trunk will happen. For simplicity sake, There is a visual studio solution in \trunk\ClassLibrary1.sln There is currently a sample project in the solution. \trunk\ClassLibrary1 Both users are fully updated and dont have any working copy changes. Below sequence of events will take place. User 1 will first add a new project in the Solution

I have next merge conflict: <<<<<<< Updated upstream my( $c, $name ) = (shift,shift); my %name = defined $name ? ( name => $name ) : (); ||||||| merged common ancestors my( $c ) = shift; ======= my( $c, $name ) = (shift,shift); my %name = defined $name ? ( name => $name ) : (); >>>>>>> Stashed changes <<<<<<< Updated upstream return $c->render_to_string( 'control/toggle', id => "toggle$id", %name, @_ ); ||||||| merged common ancestors return $c->render_to_string( 'control/toggle', @_, id => "toggle$id" ); ======= return $c->render_to_string( 'control/toggle', id => "toggle$id", %name, @_ ); >>

I often get conflicts while pulling (merging) in git over differences in newlines at the end of the file. The conflict comes out looking like this: diff --cc httpdocs/about/faq.php index 0ae3963,b5eb519..0000000 --- a/httpdocs/about/faq.php +++ b/httpdocs/about/faq.php @@@ -212,4 -211,4 +212,8 @@@ $_SESSION['activePage'] = 'about' </div><!-- end wrap --> -<?php require RESOURCE_PATH."page_elements".SLASH."footer.php"; ?> ++<<<<<<< HEAD +<?php require RESOURCE_PATH."page_elements".SLASH."footer.php"; ?> ++======= ++<?php require RESOURCE_PATH."page_elements".SLASH."footer.php"; ?> ++>>>>>>>

My Android app updates a Google Drive document. The file can be modified also elsewhere (e.g. through Drive web interface), so there may be a conflict on file upload. However, this should rarely happen. That's why I don't want my app to first query the revision history (since this is in most cases unnecessary) and only after that, update the file. How can I detect that there is a conflict when updating the file? My investigation so far reveals that getHeadRevisionId() returns null although the null head revision id has been reported fixed . Another thing I tried was setEtag() on the file

We are using git and the merge workflow. We have lot of git newbies (including me) who either have an SVN or CVS background, or no version control background at all. Here is a frequent issue we are running into. Many of the team members were using TortoiseGit. Merge conflicts happened fairly often because of concurrent changes - or since they did not pull every day. One user would do a pull, have a merge conflict, resolve the merge conflict, and then look at the list of files to be committed back. But then the file list shows a lot of files, though there were merge conflicts involved in only a

could you please suggest me the way I could automatically resolve primary key conflicts during a merge between Publisher and Subscriber. It seems Sql Server doesn't do it out of the box :(. Conflict viewer shows me next message: A row insert at '_publisher_server_' could not be propagated to '_subscriber_server_'. This failure can be caused by a constraint violation. Violation of PRIMARY KEY constraint 'PK_ PartPlan _FD9D7F927172C0B5'. Cannot insert duplicate key in object '_table_name_'. Thank you. This isn't an easy solution (since you've presumably already designed your database with auto