merge-conflict-resolution

GIT 2 or more merge conflicts in a single file - how p4merge handles?

阅读更多关于 GIT 2 or more merge conflicts in a single file - how p4merge handles?

问题 GIT p4merge - 2 or more conflict in same file I have integrated p4merge with GIT and i came across this situation once. I have a file with merge conflicts. The file say foo.c has merge conflicts in 3 different lines of code (the first line with conflict, some lines in the middle with conflicts). When i resolved the first lines of conflict (not other lines of conflict) and saved (using save button on p4merge) i guess it adds the foo.c to index, and when i commit, git allows me to commit

Re-use conflict resolution with Git

阅读更多关于 Re-use conflict resolution with Git

Can I tell Git to re-use the conflict resolution from an existing merge commit? I had rerere disabled at the time of commit. The new merge commit contains a few additional commits on the "ours" side of the merge (but they should not introduce new conflicts as they modified a different set of files). For instance, take the following DAG: m [master] Add new stuff * | o [old-master] Merge branch A (conflicts) |/a [branch A] n * * * */ * Now, what I want to do is to bring commits m and m^ into the branch old-master (and later make that the new master). I don't want to simply merge master into old

Feature backporting in Git / Subversion

阅读更多关于 Feature backporting in Git / Subversion

What would be the preferred way to achieve the following workflow with either Git or Subversion (I have more interest in the Git version, but comparison will definitely be useful): Let's say we had a major release of the product recently and there is a specific polisihin branch called release-2.0.x . The development then continued and several feature branches were merged into the master/trunk (they will later become the part of the upcoming release-2.1.x ). Now, at some point another feature (namely, critical-feature ) was developed and merged back to master/trunk . We realize that this

why git stash cannot abandon the changes made just now?

阅读更多关于 why git stash cannot abandon the changes made just now?

问题 i forked a project from github, and the origin point to my own github repo, remote point to its original repo, since i want to get update from remote, i use git pull remote branch_name, then my local repo is in conflict mode, now i want to cancel the effect of git pull, so i use git stash, but was surprised to find i failed to do this? what's wrong? the detailed info is as follows: [mirror@home weechat]$ git status # On branch master # Unmerged paths: # (use "git add/rm <file>..." as

How to make a Git merge operation ignore identical changes made to both branches?

阅读更多关于 How to make a Git merge operation ignore identical changes made to both branches?

问题 Lets assume that we have one development branch 'A', and two sub branches 'B1' and 'B2', (both taken from A). Lets say that you run a format code command (in our case ReSharper's cleanup code) on the entire project in B1 and B2. Now, when we try to merge B2 into B1, Git will report conflicts on all files in the project (quite a large number in our case). When looking closer at each conflict, it seems like Git thinks theres a conflict even though the exact same change was made in both B1 and

Git conflicted copy error while cloning a repository

阅读更多关于 Git conflicted copy error while cloning a repository

问题 I am using dropbox as a git repository. Now due to some issue in the syncing, there is some conflicted copy present in the git. How do I remove this conflict ? Due to this conflict I am unable to clone the contents of that repository. The error I am getting while cloning the repository is:- Git :- fatal: Reference has invalid format: 'refs/heads/debugging (xyz conflictedcopy date) ' 回答1: The solution that eventually worked for me was to simply delete the branch that the reference refers to, e

Cannot Merge due to conflict with UserInterfaceState.xcuserstate

阅读更多关于 Cannot Merge due to conflict with UserInterfaceState.xcuserstate

问题 I created a branch and made a bunch of changes. I committed the changes and then archived the changes. Then I switched to the master branch and tried to do a merge. It said I had uncommitted changes. So I did a commit on the master branch to see what it was talking about. It said that there is a file called UserInterfaceState.xcuserstate that was modified. So I committed the change (not sure what the change was). Then I tried to merge again. It then opens up a merge window and indicates that

GIT 2 or more merge conflicts in a single file - how p4merge handles?

阅读更多关于 GIT 2 or more merge conflicts in a single file - how p4merge handles?

GIT p4merge - 2 or more conflict in same file I have integrated p4merge with GIT and i came across this situation once. I have a file with merge conflicts. The file say foo.c has merge conflicts in 3 different lines of code (the first line with conflict, some lines in the middle with conflicts). When i resolved the first lines of conflict (not other lines of conflict) and saved (using save button on p4merge) i guess it adds the foo.c to index, and when i commit, git allows me to commit without giving me an error or warning to resolve the other conflicting lines in the same file. Is this an

Telling git to follow moved content (not simply moved files)

阅读更多关于 Telling git to follow moved content (not simply moved files)

问题 While refactoring source code, sometimes you need to move big blocks of text inside a file, or even to a new file. You create a branch refactored and commit away: $git checkout master $git branch refactored $git checkout refactored <move code around> $git commit -m "refactored code" However, people may commit on top of the old pre-refactor branch, changing the code that was moved: $git checkout master <change code that was moved elsewhere on branch refactored> $git commit -m "bugfix" On

Git compare “base” version with “theirs” version of a conflicted file?

阅读更多关于 Git compare “base” version with “theirs” version of a conflicted file?

问题 Given a conflicted file foo.txt , how to tell git diff to show changes between the base version of the file and "their" version of the file? I can see each of the versions via git show :1:foo.txt or git show:3:foo.txt - is there a simple way to compare the two versions? 回答1: git diff :1:foo.txt :3:foo.txt 回答2: Simply type git diff and it will show only the conflicts. Further reading: Advanced Merging Notice the --base and --theirs arguments for diff 来源： https://stackoverflow.com/questions