merge-conflict-resolution

My routine on git has always been very simple: git add -A git commit -m 'the changes I made' git pull # resolve conflicts git push However, for some unknown reasons, despite lots of conflicts with the origin, after pulling, I don't get any conflicts and without my permission it force updates my local copy. Something along these lines: '2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)'. But in my case, conflicts shouldn't be resolved from simple merge and should require manual conflict resolution from my side. Why is git not letting me to do the manual conflict resolution? Thanks in advance!

How do I resolve a binary file conflict resolution during a merge operation in git? Here's what I've done so far: git checkout master git fetch origin git merge working_branch ... [Conflicts] ... git status ... Unmerged paths: both modified: Path/file.dll ... I want to keep the version in the working_branch and discard the version in the master . How do I do this? Figured it out earlier today: git checkout --theirs Path/file.dll git add Path/file.dll git commit -m "Resolved merge conflict by checking out file from working_branch and adding it to the master" 来源： https://stackoverflow.com

How can I simply (e.g. in one command?) merge in Git, keeping the state of conflicting files as in the current branch and without specifying each file individually as in theirs/ours options? git checkout master git merge stable --some-option-to-keep-files-? The merge strategy has an "ours" option which is what you want git merge -s recursive -X ours remote/branch As the manpage stresses out, this is NOT git merge -s ours. 来源： https://stackoverflow.com/questions/12572530/can-i-merge-only-non-conflicting-changes-in-git

I have not done so much with git so far. Now, I have the following problem. While I did some local modifications and commits, my colleague restructured files and folders within a new branch. Then, I added a remote tracking branch (reflecting his changes) and tried to merge my modifications into it. Of course it fails as the files moved to another location. How can I go onwards? A 'git status' shows me this: # On branch develop # You have unmerged paths. # (fix conflicts and run "git commit") # # Unmerged paths: # (use "git add/rm <file>..." as appropriate to mark resolution) # # deleted by us:

I am looking for a tool that will split a file that has conflict markers into the two separate files. Is there anything out there that does this already? xxdiff can do that: xxdiff --unmerge myfile.txt it also works if the conflict markers result from a 3-way diff xxdiff --unmerge3 myfile.txt The tool I work for ( ECMerge ) does that, primarily with the target of helping you to merge them visually of course. You could as well save the left/right/ancestor files with the built-in Javascript engine. ECMerge reads markers for most 'well-known' source code controls (CVS, git, mercurial, bazaar,

I'm trying to do a "git stash pop" with a binary file. It results in a merge conflict. I just want to pull what's in the stash off and overwrite what's in the working directory. What is the easiest way to do that? To restore all files to their stashed version: $ git checkout stash -- . 来源： https://stackoverflow.com/questions/29979038/git-stash-pop-with-binary-merge-conflict