Has anyone ever tried to combine the use of google guice with obfuscation (in particular proguard)? The obfuscated version of my code does not work with google guice as guice complains about missing type parameters. This information seems to be erased by the transformation step that proguard does, even when the relevant classes are excluded from the obfuscation.
The stack trace looks like this:
com.google.inject.CreationException: Guice creation errors:
1) Cannot inject a Provider that has no type parameter
while locating com.google.inject.Provider
for parameter 0 at de.repower.lvs.client.admin.user.administration.AdminUserCommonPanel.setPasswordPanelProvider(SourceFile:499)
at de.repower.lvs.client.admin.user.administration.AdminUserCommonPanel.setPasswordPanelProvider(SourceFile:499)
while locating de.repower.lvs.client.admin.user.administration.AdminUserCommonPanel
for parameter 0 at de.repower.lvs.client.admin.user.administration.b.k.setParentPanel(SourceFile:65)
at de.repower.lvs.client.admin.user.administration.b.k.setParentPanel(SourceFile:65)
at de.repower.lvs.client.admin.user.administration.o.a(SourceFile:38)
2) Cannot inject a Provider that has no type parameter
while locating com.google.inject.Provider
for parameter 0 at de.repower.lvs.client.admin.user.administration.AdminUserCommonPanel.setWindTurbineAccessGroupProvider(SourceFile:509)
at de.repower.lvs.client.admin.user.administration.AdminUserCommonPanel.setWindTurbineAccessGroupProvider(SourceFile:509)
while locating de.repower.lvs.client.admin.user.administration.AdminUserCommonPanel
for parameter 0 at de.repower.lvs.client.admin.user.administration.b.k.setParentPanel(SourceFile:65)
at de.repower.lvs.client.admin.user.administration.b.k.setParentPanel(SourceFile:65)
at de.repower.lvs.client.admin.user.administration.o.a(SourceFile:38)
2 errors
at com.google.inject.internal.Errors.throwCreationExceptionIfErrorsExist(Errors.java:354)
at com.google.inject.InjectorBuilder.initializeStatically(InjectorBuilder.java:152)
at com.google.inject.InjectorBuilder.build(InjectorBuilder.java:105)
at com.google.inject.Guice.createInjector(Guice.java:92)
at com.google.inject.Guice.createInjector(Guice.java:69)
at com.google.inject.Guice.createInjector(Guice.java:59)
I tried to create a small example (without using guice) that seems to reproduce the problem:
package de.repower.common;
import java.lang.reflect.Method;
import java.lang.reflect.ParameterizedType;
import java.lang.reflect.Type;
class SomeClass<S> {
}
public class ParameterizedTypeTest {
public void someMethod(SomeClass<Integer> param) {
System.out.println("value: " + param);
System.setProperty("my.dummmy.property", "hallo");
}
private static void checkParameterizedMethod(ParameterizedTypeTest testObject) {
System.out.println("checking parameterized method ...");
Method[] methods = testObject.getClass().getMethods();
for (Method method : methods) {
if (method.getName().equals("someMethod")) {
System.out.println("Found method " + method.getName());
Type[] types = method.getGenericParameterTypes();
Type parameterType = types[0];
if (parameterType instanceof ParameterizedType) {
Type parameterizedType = ((ParameterizedType) parameterType).getActualTypeArguments()[0];
System.out.println("Parameter: " + parameterizedType);
System.out.println("Class: " + ((Class) parameterizedType).getName());
} else {
System.out.println("Failed: type ist not instance of ParameterizedType");
}
}
}
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
System.out.println("Starting ...");
try {
ParameterizedTypeTest someInstance = new ParameterizedTypeTest();
checkParameterizedMethod(someInstance);
} catch (SecurityException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
}
If you run this code unsbfuscated, the output looks like this:
Starting ...
checking parameterized method ...
Found method someMethod
Parameter: class java.lang.Integer
Class: java.lang.Integer
But running the version obfuscated with proguard yields:
Starting ...
checking parameterized method ...
Found method someMethod
Failed: type ist not instance of ParameterizedType
These are the options I used for obfuscation:
-injars classes_eclipse\methodTest.jar
-outjars classes_eclipse\methodTestObfuscated.jar
-libraryjars 'C:\Program Files\Java\jre6\lib\rt.jar'
-dontskipnonpubliclibraryclasses
-dontskipnonpubliclibraryclassmembers
-dontshrink
-printusage classes_eclipse\shrink.txt
-dontoptimize
-dontpreverify
-verbose
-keep class **.ParameterizedTypeTest.class {
<fields>;
<methods>;
}
-keep class ** {
<fields>;
<methods>;
}
# Keep - Applications. Keep all application classes, along with their 'main'
# methods.
-keepclasseswithmembers public class * {
public static void main(java.lang.String[]);
}
# Also keep - Enumerations. Keep the special static methods that are required in
# enumeration classes.
-keepclassmembers enum * {
public static **[] values();
public static ** valueOf(java.lang.String);
}
# Also keep - Database drivers. Keep all implementations of java.sql.Driver.
-keep class * extends java.sql.Driver
# Also keep - Swing UI L&F. Keep all extensions of javax.swing.plaf.ComponentUI,
# along with the special 'createUI' method.
-keep class * extends javax.swing.plaf.ComponentUI {
public static javax.swing.plaf.ComponentUI createUI(javax.swing.JComponent);
}
# Keep names - Native method names. Keep all native class/method names.
-keepclasseswithmembers,allowshrinking class * {
native <methods>;
}
# Keep names - _class method names. Keep all .class method names. This may be
# useful for libraries that will be obfuscated again with different obfuscators.
-keepclassmembers,allowshrinking class * {
java.lang.Class class$(java.lang.String);
java.lang.Class class$(java.lang.String,boolean);
}
Does anyone have an idea of how to solve this (apart from the obvious workaround to put the relevant files into a seperate jar and not obfuscate it)?
Best regards,
Stefan
Having used proguard for a good amount of time, here is how I decided to solve the issues regarding reflection (and Guice is only a use case of it).
Reflection can be used with Proguard as long as NO class or methods name are entered as Strings.
That's to say this code is valid and will work after ProGuard obfuscation
Class someClass = Class.forName(SomeClass.class.getName());
while this code won't work
Class someClass = Class.forName("SomeClass");
Furthermore, Proguard will shrink uncalled methods and constructor. As a consequence, the Class.newInstance method won't work. Unfortunatly, usual Guice bindings works using this method.
This has some consequences on Guice code.
- All your injections must be produced using @Provides annotated methods, since ProGuard will shrink classes due to the fact their constructors are not explictely called.
- Proguard must not shrink the code of your modules classes.
- ProGuard must not shrink annotations, whichever, and wherever they are (this can be configured, but I cannot remember where).
The "Signature" attribute is required to be able to access generic types when compiling in JDK 5.0 and higher.
Use -keepattributes Signature to fix error with ParameterizedType
With the current version of Proguard (4.7) I was able to get it working by adding the following:-
-keepattributes *Annotation*,Signature
-keep class com.google.inject.Binder
-keep public class com.google.inject.Inject
# keeps all fields and Constructors with @Inject
-keepclassmembers,allowobfuscation class * {
@com.google.inject.Inject <fields>;
@com.google.inject.Inject <init>(...);
}
In addition to explicitly keeping any class that is created by Guice eg
-keep class com.example.Service
Following code works for me, having had the same problem.
-keepattributes Signature was the fix.
-optimizationpasses 5
-dontusemixedcaseclassnames
-dontskipnonpubliclibraryclasses
-dontpreverify
#-dontobfuscate
-repackageclasses ''
-keepattributes *Annotation*
-keepattributes Signature
-verbose
-optimizations !code/simplification/arithmetic,!field/*,!class/merging/*
-keep public class * extends android.app.Activity
-keep public class * extends android.app.Application
-keep public class * extends android.app.Service
-keep public class * extends android.content.BroadcastReceiver
-keep public class * extends android.content.ContentProvider
-keep public class * extends android.app.backup.BackupAgentHelper
-keep public class * extends android.preference.Preference
-keep public class com.android.vending.licensing.ILicensingService
-keepclasseswithmembernames class * {
native <methods>;
}
-keepclasseswithmembernames class * {
public <init>(android.content.Context, android.util.AttributeSet);
}
-keepclasseswithmembernames class * {
public <init>(android.content.Context, android.util.AttributeSet, int);
}
-keepclassmembers enum * {
public static **[] values();
public static ** valueOf(java.lang.String);
}
-keepattributes Signature
-keep class * implements android.os.Parcelable {
public static final android.os.Parcelable$Creator *;
}
-keep class com.google.inject.Binder
-keepclassmembers class * {
@com.google.inject.Inject <init>(...);
}
-keep public class * extends android.view.View {
public <init>(android.content.Context);
public <init>(android.content.Context, android.util.AttributeSet);
public <init>(android.content.Context, android.util.AttributeSet, int);
public void set*(...);
}
# I didn't need this one, maybe you need it.
#-keep public class roboguice.**
-keepclassmembers class **.R$* {
public static <fields>;
}
来源：https://stackoverflow.com/questions/2369939/injection-with-google-guice-does-not-work-anymore-after-obfuscation-with-proguar