Understanding scala's _ vs Any/Nothing

こ雲淡風輕ζ 提交于 2020-01-24 02:07:59

问题


If a class has a convariant type parameter such as Iterable[+A], is there any difference between declaring

def foo(bar: Iterable[_])

and

def foo(bar: Iterable[Any])

?


If a class has a contravariant type parameter such as Growable[-A], is there any difference between declaring

def foo(bar: Growable[_])

and

def foo(bar: Growable[Nothing])

?


回答1:


It does make a little difference when generic parameter is bounded. For example, if you had

class BoundedIterable[+A <: Something]
class BoundedGrowable[-A >: Something]

then type BoundedIterable[Any] and BoundedGrowable[Nothing] would be illegal.

I don't know if there is any other difference, but I can say for sure that you should prefer the wildcard-less variant wherever possible. That is because, actually, the very purpose of declaration-site type variance is to get rid of wildcards (which are a form of usage-site variance). When you say List[Any] you mean "list of anything", but when you say List[_] then you mean "list of we-don't-know-what". So the former is just way more clear, even though they may be equivalent in some particular case.



来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/15310329/understanding-scalas-vs-any-nothing

易学教程内所有资源均来自网络或用户发布的内容,如有违反法律规定的内容欢迎反馈
该文章没有解决你所遇到的问题?点击提问,说说你的问题,让更多的人一起探讨吧!