Python with tcpdump in a subprocess: how to close subprocess properly?

问题

I have a Python script to capture network traffic with tcpdump in a subprocess:

p = subprocess.Popen(['tcpdump', '-I', '-i', 'en1',
                  '-w', 'cap.pcap'], stdout=subprocess.PIPE)
time.sleep(10)
p.kill()

When this script completes its work, I'm trying to open output .pcap file in Wireshark and getting this error:

"The capture file appears to have been cut short in the middle of a packet."

What solution could be applied for "proper" closing of tcpdump's subprocess?

回答1:

Instead of p.kill(), you can use p.send_signal(subprocess.signal.SIGTERM) to send a terminate signal rather than a kill (p.terminate() does the same).

The Popen docs describe the send_signal() command. The documentation on signals is a bit weak, but a dir(subprocess.signal) will list all the signals you may send to the process, but terminate should allow it some time to clean up.

回答2:

Found working solution:
I've changed p.kill() to p.terminate().
After this change the subprocess is "properly" finished (output of tcpdump subprocess with statistics available in console) and output .pcap file not damaged.

回答3:

I had the same problem about closing subprocesses. This thread really helped, so thanks, especially to https://stackoverflow.com/users/3583715/rkh. My solution:

Before:

output = subprocess.Popen(command, stdout=subprocess.PIPE, stderr=subprocess.STDOUT, universal_newlines=True)
message = output.stdout.read()
output.stdout.close()

After reading the Popen docs:

output = subprocess.Popen(command, stdout=subprocess.PIPE, stderr=subprocess.STDOUT, universal_newlines=True)
message = output.stdout.read()
output.TerminateProcess()

For some reason, calling output.kill(), and/or output.terminate() or sending output.send_signal(subprocess.signal.SIGTERM) didn't work, but output.TerminateProcess() did.

来源：https://stackoverflow.com/questions/40140000/python-with-tcpdump-in-a-subprocess-how-to-close-subprocess-properly