Why do we use std::function in C++ rather than the original C function pointer? [duplicate]

Question

This question already has an answer here:

• Should I use std::function or a function pointer in C++? 5 answers

What is the advantage of std::function<T1(T2)> over the original T1 (*)(T2)?

Answer 1

std::function can hold more than function pointers, namely functors.

#include <functional>

void foo(double){}

struct foo_functor{
  void operator()(float) const{}
};

int main(){
  std::function<void(int)> f1(foo), f2((foo_functor()));
  f1(5);
  f2(6);
}

Live example on Ideone.

As the example shows, you also don't need the exact same signature, as long as they are compatible (i.e., the parameter type of std::function can be passed to the contained function / functor).

Answer 2

std::function can hold function objects (including lambdas), as well as function pointers with the correct signature. So it is more versatile.

Answer 3

Apart from the cleaner look and a more descriptive syntax, std::function can store any callable object:

• functions
• lambda expressions
• bind expressions
• functors

Not to mention that storing, copying, and binding objects to member functions is much easier and more intuitive.