Is Javascript substring virtual?

老子叫甜甜 提交于 2019-12-29 05:08:28

问题


If we have a huge string, named str1, say 5 million characters long, and then str2 = str1.substr(5555, 100) so that str2 is 100 characters long and is a substring of str1 starting at 5555 (or any other randomly selected position).

How JavaScript stores str2 internally? Is the string contents copied or the new string is sort of virtual and only a reference to the original string and values for position and size are stored?

I know this is implementation dependent, ECMAScript standard (probably) does not define what's under the hood of the string implementation. But I want to know from some expert who knows V8 or SpiderMonkey from inside well enough to clarify this.

Thank you


回答1:


AFAIK V8 has four string representations:

  1. ASCII
  2. UTF-16
  3. concatenation of multiple strings
  4. slice of another string

Thus, it does not have to copy the string; it just has to beginning and ending markers to the other string.

SpiderMonkey does the same thing. (See Large substrings ~9000x faster in Firefox than Chrome: why? ... though the answer for Chrome is outdated.)

This can give real speed boosts, but sometimes this is undesirable, since it can cause small strings to hold onto the memory of the larger parent string (V8 bug report)




回答2:


This old blog post of mine explains it, as well as some other string representation forms: http://blog.cdleary.com/2012/01/string-representation-in-spidermonkey/

Search for "dependent string". I think I know what you might be getting at with the question: they can be problematic things, at times, because if there are no references to the original, you can keep a giant string around in order to keep a bitty little substring that's actually semantically reachable. There are things that an implementation could do to mitigate that problem, like record information on a GC-generation basis to see if such one-dependent-string entities exist and collapse them to their minimal size, but last I knew of that was not being done. (Essentially with that kind of approach you're recovering runtime_refcount == 1 style information at GC-sweep time.)




回答3:


Strings are immutable, and any operations on them create new strings. str2 is an entirely new string, containing data copied from str1.



来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/20536662/is-javascript-substring-virtual

易学教程内所有资源均来自网络或用户发布的内容,如有违反法律规定的内容欢迎反馈
该文章没有解决你所遇到的问题?点击提问,说说你的问题,让更多的人一起探讨吧!