问题
class base {
public:
base a;
};
It gives compilation error.
class base {
public:
static base a;
};
whereas this code does not give compilation error
回答1:
Because static class members are not stored in the class instance, that's why a static would work.
Storing an object inside another object of the same type would break the runtime - infinite size, right?
What would sizeof return? The size of the object needs to be known by the compiler, but since it contains an object of the same type, it doesn't make sense.
回答2:
I'm guessing the error is something like
field ‘a’ has incomplete type
This is because when not static, the class A is not fully defined until the closing brace. Static member variables, on the other hand, need a separate definition step after the class is fully defined, which is why they work.
Search for the difference between declaration and definition for more thorough explanations.
来源：https://stackoverflow.com/questions/8517609/why-is-a-class-allowed-to-have-a-static-member-of-itself-but-not-a-non-static-m