Java: How to scale threads according to cpu cores?

问题

I\'m not a good java programmer, it\'s just my hobby, but I\'m eager to know more than average stuff.

I want to solve a mathematical problem with multiple threads in java. my math problem can be separated into work units, that I want to have solved in several threads.

but I don\'t want to have a fixed amount of threads working on it, but instead a coresponding amount of threads to the amount of cpu cores. and my problem is, that I couldn\'t find an easy tutorial in the internet for this. all I found are examples with fixed threads.

So could you help me with a link to a good tuturial or could give me an easy and good example? That would be really nice :)

回答1:

You can determine the number of processes available to the Java Virtual Machine by using the static Runtime method, availableProcessors. Once you have determined the number of processors available, create that number of threads and split up your work accordingly.

Update: To further clarify, a Thread is just an Object in Java, so you can create it just like you would create any other object. So, let's say that you call the above method and find that it returns 2 processors. Awesome. Now, you can create a loop that generates a new Thread, and splits the work off for that thread, and fires off the thread. Here's some psuedocode to demonstrate what I mean:

int processors = Runtime.getRuntime().availableProcessors();
for(int i=0; i < processors; i++) {
  Thread yourThread = new AThreadYouCreated();
  // You may need to pass in parameters depending on what work you are doing and how you setup your thread.
  yourThread.start();
}

For more information on creating your own thread, head to this tutorial. Also, you may want to look at Thread Pooling for the creation of the threads.

回答2:

You probably want to look at the java.util.concurrent framework for this stuff too. Something like:

ExecutorService e = Executors.newFixedThreadPool(Runtime.getRuntime().availableProcessors());
// Do work using something like either
e.execute(new Runnable() {
        public void run() {
            // do one task
        }
    });

    Future<String> future = pool.submit(new Callable<String>() {
        public String call() throws Exception {
            return null;
        }
    });
    future.get();  // Will block till result available

This is a lot nicer than coping with your own thread pools etc.

回答3:

Doug Lea (author of the concurrent package) has this paper which may be relevant: http://gee.cs.oswego.edu/dl/papers/fj.pdf

The Fork Join framework has been added to Java SE 7. Below are few more references:

http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/java/library/j-jtp11137/index.html Article by Brian Goetz

http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/articles/java/fork-join-422606.html

回答4:

Option 1:

newWorkStealingPool from Executors

public static ExecutorService newWorkStealingPool()

Creates a work-stealing thread pool using all available processors as its target parallelism level.

With this API, you don't need to pass number of cores to ExecutorService.

Implementation of this API from grepcode

/**
     * Creates a work-stealing thread pool using all
     * {@link Runtime#availableProcessors available processors}
     * as its target parallelism level.
     * @return the newly created thread pool
     * @see #newWorkStealingPool(int)
     * @since 1.8
     */
    public static ExecutorService newWorkStealingPool() {
        return new ForkJoinPool
            (Runtime.getRuntime().availableProcessors(),
             ForkJoinPool.defaultForkJoinWorkerThreadFactory,
             null, true);
    }

Option 2:

newFixedThreadPool API from Executors or other newXXX constructors, which returns ExecutorService

public static ExecutorService newFixedThreadPool(int nThreads)

replace nThreads with Runtime.getRuntime().availableProcessors()

Option 3:

ThreadPoolExecutor

public ThreadPoolExecutor(int corePoolSize,
                      int maximumPoolSize,
                      long keepAliveTime,
                      TimeUnit unit,
                      BlockingQueue<Runnable> workQueue)

pass Runtime.getRuntime().availableProcessors() as parameter to maximumPoolSize.

回答5:

The standard way is the Runtime.getRuntime().availableProcessors() method. On most standard CPUs you will have returned the optimal thread count (which is not the actual CPU core count) here. Therefore this is what you are looking for.

Example:

ExecutorService service = Executors.newFixedThreadPool(Runtime.getRuntime().availableProcessors());

Do NOT forget to shut down the executor service like this (or your program won't exit):

service.shutdown();

Here just a quick outline how to set up a future based MT code (offtopic, for illustration):

CompletionService<YourCallableImplementor> completionService = 
    new ExecutorCompletionService<YourCallableImplementor>(service);
    ArrayList<Future<YourCallableImplementor>> futures = new ArrayList<Future<YourCallableImplementor>>();
    for (String computeMe : elementsToCompute) {
        futures.add(completionService.submit(new YourCallableImplementor(computeMe)));
    }

Then you need to keep track on how many results you expect and retrieve them like this:

try {
  int received = 0;
  while (received < elementsToCompute.size()) {
     Future<YourCallableImplementor> resultFuture = completionService.take(); 
     YourCallableImplementor result = resultFuture.get();
     received++; 
  }
} finally {
  service.shutdown();
}

回答6:

On the Runtime class, there is a method called availableProcessors(). You can use that to figure out how many CPUs you have. Since your program is CPU bound, you would probably want to have (at most) one thread per available CPU.

来源：https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1980832/java-how-to-scale-threads-according-to-cpu-cores

标签

java

multithreading

cpu-cores