问题
How can I restrict the implementation class of my Abstract class from modifying the scope of a method from protected to public?
For example : Suppose I have a Abstract Class
package com.rao.test;
public abstract class AbstractTEClass {
protected abstract void function1();
protected abstract void function2();
protected void doWork() //I want to call the abstract methods from this method.
{
function1(); //implementation classes will give implementation of these methods
function2();
}
}
Now, I have a implementation class which extends the above abstract class
package com.rao.test;
public class AbstractTEClassImpl extends AbstractTEClass {
@Override
public void function1() {
// TODO Auto-generated method stub
System.out.println("FUnction1");
}
@Override
public void function2() {
// TODO Auto-generated method stub
System.out.println("Function2");
}
public static void main(String[] args)
{
AbstractTEClassImpl objTEClass = new AbstractTEClassImpl();
objTEClass.doWork();
}
}
Notice here that I am changing the scope of the 2 abstract methods in the implementation class from protected to public, how can I restrict my implementation class from modifying the scope.
Any design changes or recommendation or patterns are welcome.
回答1:
You can't. I suspect what you want to do is fiddle with doWork() so it can survive any abuse extending classes might do inside the function1 and 2 overrides. You might want to add methods and/or change what those methods do.
Overriding is a handy thing. I often get real annoyed working in C# because Microsoft "seals" everything to prevent overriding. (I exaggerate; they only seal the methods I want to override.) Don't go that route. Figure out what your real problem is and handle it in your base AbstractTEClass class.
回答2:
You can't.
An overriding class can always give more access to a method than the method it's overriding.
Read the section on modifiers here http://docs.oracle.com/javase/tutorial/java/IandI/override.html
The access specifier for an overriding method can allow more, but not less, access than the overridden method. For example, a protected instance method in the superclass can be made public, but not private, in the subclass.
You will get a compile-time error if you attempt to change an instance method in the superclass to a class method in the subclass, and vice versa.
回答3:
There is no way to do that. And I don't see the point either: if the subclass wants to make this method accessible, why shouldn't it? It won't affect users of the parent abstract class anyway.
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/11343763/how-to-restrict-child-classes-from-modifying-the-scope-of-a-method-in-abstract-c