lock-free calc: how to sum N double numbers that are changing by other threads?

问题

upd: Let me rephrase my question shortly. There are N double numbers. There are N dedicated threads each of them update own double number (_cachedProduct in the example below).

Somehow I need to have sum of these numbers and I need IndexUpdated event to be raised ASAP after any double number is changed (it would be nice if such event can be raised in 10 µs or less).

Below is how I tried to implement this task

===============================================

To calculate stock exchange index I create private double[] _cachedProduct; field. These field is written by many threads

    // called from another threads
    public override void InstrumentUpdated(Instrument instrument)
    {
        if (!_initialized)
        {
            if (!Initialize())
            {
                return;
            }
        }
        int instrumentId = instrument.Id;
        OrderBook ob = Program.market.OrderBook(instrument);
        if (ob.MedianOrAskOrBid == null)
        {
            _cachedProduct[instrumentId] = 0;
        }
        else
        {
            _cachedProduct[instrumentId] = ((double) ob.MedianOrAskOrBid)*_ammounts[instrumentId];
        }
    }

_ammounts is pre-initialized array and please ignore Initialize method and variable - they just works.

In loop I just sum all _cachedProduct and when values changes I notify others.

        Task.Factory.StartNew(() =>
                {
                    while(true)
                    {
                        if (_initialized)
                        {
                            break;
                        }
                    }
                    while (true)
                    {
                        CalculateAndNotify();
                        //Thread.Sleep(5);
                    }
                }
            , TaskCreationOptions.LongRunning);


    protected void CalculateAndNotify()
    {
        var oldValue = Value;
        Calculate();
        if (oldValue != Value)
        {
            NotifyIndexChanged();
        } 
    }

    protected override void Calculate()
    {
        double result = 0;
        for (int i = 0; i < _instrumentIds.Count(); i++)
        {
            int instrumentId = _instrumentIds[i];
            if (_cachedProduct[instrumentId] == 0)
            {
                Value = null;
                return;
            }
            result += _cachedProduct[instrumentId];;
        }
        Value = result;
    }

I must use Interlocked to update my double _cachedProduct values but please ignore that fact now, what other problems with this code do you see?

Should I call Calculate method inside while(true) so I always use one core without delays. My machine has 24 cores so I was thinking this is ok.

However without Thread.Sleep(5) (commented) I do see significant slow-down in the program overall and I do not understand why. Program executes several dozens times slower in many places.

The question is if my idea of using while(true) without any locking at all is OK. Or should I introduce some locking method so I would only Calculate index when one of of _cachedProduct is updated?

回答1:

I think you might get better performance and clearer code if you do not use an extra thread and loop for your sum. On every change to an instrument you calculate the difference and immediately update the index and perform the notify

So if a thread calls InstrumentUpdated for a single instrument;

  change = newvalue - currentvalue;
  // used interlocked here to change the index threadsafe
  StockExchangeSum = Interlocked.Add(ref StockExchangeSum,change);
  NotifyIndexChanged();

回答2:

Can double[] be a more complex type? How does WaitHandle.WaitAny compare performance wise?

Something like as follows.

private Index[] indicies;

public class Index
{
    public WaitHandle Updated =
        new EventWaitHandle(false, EventResetMode.AutoReset);
    public double _value;
    public double Value
    {
        get {return _value;}
        set
        {
            if(_value != value)
            {
                _value = value;
                Updated.Set();
            }
        }
    }
}

TaskFactory.StartNew(() =>
{
    while(true)
    {
        WaitHandle.Any(indicies.Select(i => i.Updated));
        CalculateAndNotify();
    }
});

回答3:

Some points for you to think about

Have you tried profiling your calculation block in isolation to the rest of the code? I noticed this in your Calculate function:

for (int i = 0; i < _instrumentIds.Count(); i++)

_instrumentIds.Count() invokes an iteration over the entire collection and it is possible this is invoked for each trip around the loop. i.e. you are doing N^2/2 iterations of _instrumentIds
Is the _instrumentIdsIEnumerable being modified during this calculation operation? If so you could get all sorts of race conditions leading to incorrect answers.
Is the Task containing CalculateAndNotify called once or is it called many times (nested)? E.g. is there some operation inside CalculateAndNotify that could cause it to be triggered recursively?

If so, you might find you have several calculations performing simultaneously (using more than one thread until the pool is starved). Can you include some logging on start/end of operation and perhaps count the number of simultaneous calculations to check this?

If this is an issue you could include some logic whereby the CalculateAndNotify operation is queued up and new calculate operations cannot be executed until the previous has completed.

来源：https://stackoverflow.com/questions/11392169/lock-free-calc-how-to-sum-n-double-numbers-that-are-changing-by-other-threads

标签

performance

locking