Semantics of Oracle stored procedures / functions in a transactional context

情到浓时终转凉″ 提交于 2019-12-22 18:28:43

问题


I have recently had some input from a colleague regarding committing in a stored function. Whether we use procedures or functions to execute offline / batch logic in an Oracle database is mostly a matter of taste in our application. In both cases, we return a code either as function result, or as procedure OUT parameter. We usually require those offline / batch routines to be called from PL/SQL, not from SQL:

-- good
declare
  rc number(7);
begin
  rc := our_function(1, 2, 3);
end;

-- less good
select our_function(1, 2, 3) from dual;

The reason why the latter is less good is because our_function may commit the transaction for performance reasons. This is ok for a batch routine.

The question is: Are there any best practices around this topic, or some special keywords that prevent such functions from being used in SQL statements on a compiler-level? Or should we avoid functions for batch operations and only use procedures?


回答1:


You can use RESTRICT_REFERENCES to indicate that a function won't read/write package or database state.

CREATE PACKAGE t_pkg AS
   FUNCTION showup (msg VARCHAR2) RETURN VARCHAR2;
   PRAGMA RESTRICT_REFERENCES(showup, WNDS, RNDS);
END t_pkg;
/
-- create the package body
CREATE OR REPLACE PACKAGE BODY t_pkg AS
   FUNCTION showup (msg VARCHAR2) RETURN VARCHAR2 IS
    v_val varchar2(1);
   BEGIN
      select dummy into v_val from dual;
      RETURN v_val;
   END;
END t_pkg;
/

It used to be the case that SQL wouldn't allow you to call a function unless it made such a promise, but that restriction got dropped.

I'd prefer to make it a differentiator between a procedure and a function. It's worth bearing in mind that if a PL/SQL function raises a NO_DATA_FOUND exception, a calling SQL statement does not fail (as no data found isn't an SQL error). So I prefer to use procedures unless the object is specifically designed to be called from SQL.




回答2:


Are there any best practices around this topic, or some special keywords that prevent such functions from being used in SQL statements on a compiler-level?

If you use a function that requires a transaction (and therefore a commit), AFAIK you will not be able to call it from a SELECT, unless the function uses an AUTONOMOUS TRANSACTION (otherwise you get a ORA-14551 cannot perform a DML operation inside a query).

See also: ORA-14551: cannot perform a DML operation inside a query

So, having a function that requires a transaction itself should prevent it from being called from a SELECT.




回答3:


From my point of view there is no way to accomplish this.Although you can avoid runtime errors like "ORA-14551" by using PRAGMA RESTRICT_REFERENCES in "our_function(1, 2, 3)" to be sure that it is safe to use it the SQL query,but you can't prevent it from using in sql at the compiler-level



来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/6856743/semantics-of-oracle-stored-procedures-functions-in-a-transactional-context

易学教程内所有资源均来自网络或用户发布的内容,如有违反法律规定的内容欢迎反馈
该文章没有解决你所遇到的问题?点击提问,说说你的问题,让更多的人一起探讨吧!