问题
They seem to do the same thing.
g = [{ a: "A" }, { b: "B" }]
r = [{ x: "X" }, { y: "Y" }]
g.zip(r) # => [[{:a=>"A"}, {:x=>"X"}], [{:b=>"B"}, {:y=>"Y"}]]
[g,r].transpose # => [[{:a=>"A"}, {:x=>"X"}], [{:b=>"B"}, {:y=>"Y"}]]
Why have both methods?
回答1:
#transpose Assumes that self is an array of arrays and transposes the rows and columns.
#zip assumes self
can be any Enumerable object.
More differences are here
a = [12,11,21]
b = [1,2]
[a,b].transpose # transpose': element size differs (2 should be 3) (IndexError)
a.zip(b) # => [[12, 1], [11, 2], [21, nil]]
b.zip(a) # => [[1, 12], [2, 11]]
That to apply the #transpose
method a
and b
should be of the same size. But for applying #zip
, it is not needed b
to be of the same size of a
, ie b
and a
can be of any of size.
With #zip
, the resultant array size will always be the size of self
. With #transpose
the resulting array size will be any of the inner array's size of self
.
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/21455310/why-does-ruby-have-zip-and-transpose-when-they-do-the-same-thing