问题
I need some help with positioning divs. The HTML structure is as follows:
<div class="container">
<div class="item">
<div class="left">
lorem lorem
</div>
<div class="right">
<p>right</p>
<p class="bottom">bottom</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
And I have the following CSS:
.container {
float: left;
padding: 15px;
width: 600px;
}
.item {
float: left;
padding: 15px;
width: 570px;
}
.left {
float: left;
padding: 40px 20px;
margin-right: 10px;
}
.right {
position: relative;
float: left;
}
.bottom {
position: absolute;
bottom: 0;
}
The width and height of the left div is dynamic.
What I want to achieve is:
- Make the height of the right div equal to height of the left div.
- Make the width of the right div fill the rest of the div with class
item. - The paragraph with class
bottomshould be at the bottom of the right div.
Here is a simple image that represents my goal:
And a link to a JSFiddle demo.
回答1:
Getting the correct position and width of .bottom appears to be the biggest hurdle for a cross-browser, CSS solution.
Options
1. Floats
As @joeellis demonstrated, the flexible widths can be achieved by floating only the left column, and applying overflow:hidden to the right column.
The position of .bottom cannot be achieved in any browser. There's no CSS solution for floated columns with equal, variable height. An absolutely positioned .bottom element must be inside the right column div, so that 100% width would give it the correct size. But since the right column won't necessarily be as tall as the left column, positioning .bottom with bottom:0 won't necessarily place it at the bottom of the container.
2. HTML tables and CSS tables
The flexible widths can be achieved by giving the left cell a width of 1px and not specifying a width for the right cell. Both cells will grow to fit the content. Any extra space will be added to the right cell alone.
If .bottom is inside the right table cell, the position can't be achieved in Firefox. Relative position has no effect in a table cell in Firefox; absolute position and 100% width would not be relative to the right table cell.
If .bottom is treated as a separate table cell in the right column, the correct heights of the right and bottom table cells cannot be achieved in any browser other than Firefox. Table cells aren't flexible in height the same way they are in width (except in Firefox).
3. CSS3 flexbox and CSS3 grids
Flexbox and grids are the promising layout tools of the near future. But flexbox isn't supported by IE9 or earlier, and grids aren't supported by any browser other than IE10. Haven't tested if either can achieve this layout, but browser support may prevent them from being an option at present.
Summary
- Floats don't offer a solution for any browser.
- HTML tables and CSS tables don't offer a cross-browser solution.
- Flexbox doesn't offer a potential solution for IE9 or earlier (and may or may not offer a solution to other browsers).
- Grids only offer a potential solution to IE10 (and may or may not offer a solution there).
Conclusion
There doesn't appear to be an adequate CSS solution at present, one that would work in enough relevant browsers, with the possible exception of flexbox (if support for IE9 and earlier isn't required).
jQuery
Here's a couple modified demos that use jQuery to force the columns to have the same height. The CSS and jQuery for both demos is the same. The HTML only differs by how much content is in the left and right column. Both demos tested fine in all browsers. The same basic approach could be used for plain JavaScript.
- Taller content on the left
- Taller content on the right
To keep things simple, I moved the internal padding for the left and right div to a child element (.content).
回答2:
Sibling elements of same height and staying on the same row can be achieved by displaying them as table-cell and parent as display: table.
Working fiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/SgubR/2/ (which also display the overflow: hidden along a floating element technique for creating a column. The latter needs a clearfix)
Table-cell in CSS uses any HTML element you want (section, div, span, li, whatever), its semantics is unrelated to table, tr and td elements used for table layout (except that the visual result is the same, that's what we want).
display: tableis set on a parentdisplay: table-rowmay be used on an element in-between but if it works without it, finedisplay: table-cellis set on each child- a width is set on none, some or all these "cells". Browser will adapt both to content and widths set in order to calculate their widths (and total width of parent, obviously)
table-layout: fixedwill tell browsers to switch to the other table layout algorithm where they don't care about the quantity of content, only to widths set by CSSvertical-align: topwill be needed in most cases (but you may set other values, great for complex layouts)- margins aren't applied on "cells", only padding. Margins only apply on table itself. Though you still can separate "cells" with
border-collapse: separateand/orborder-spacing: 4px 6px
Compatibility: IE8+
Fallback for IE6/7 if needed is exactly the same as for inline-block
Longer explanations in previous answers: here and there with also the good old method of faux-columns (your design must be thought with this technique in mind)
回答3:
Just add an oveflow to the right column and don't float it.
.right {
position: relative;
overflow: hidden;
}
This will make right to fill the rest of the width.
回答4:
Something like this might work:
http://jsfiddle.net/PCvy9/2/
The main key of what you're looking for lines in the:
.right {
overflow: hidden;
background-color: #C82927;
}
This is due to something called the "block formatting context." Great reasoning and tutorial as to why here: http://colinaarts.com/articles/the-magic-of-overflow-hidden/#making-room-for-floats
However, their heights are not completely linked; in this example, your left side block's height would still need to be manually set (as it's a floated container)
来源：https://stackoverflow.com/questions/15852979/make-div-fill-remaining-space-of-parent