问题
I'm trying to inject things with Google Guice 2.0 and I have the following structure:
FooAction implements Action
BarAction implements Action
I then have an ActionLibrary with the following constructor:
ActionLibrary (List<Action> theActions)
When I request an instance of ActionLibrary from Guice, I would like Guice to identify both of the registered Action classes (FooAction, BarAction) and pass them into the constructor. The motivation here being that when I add a third action BazAction, it would be as simple as registering it in the Module and it would automatically be added to the list in the constructor.
Is this possible?
回答1:
What you want for this is Multibindings. Specifically, you want to bind a Set<Action> (not a List, but a Set is probably what you really want anyway) like this:
Multibinder<Action> actionBinder = Multibinder.newSetBinder(binder(), Action.class);
actionBinder.addBinding().to(FooAction.class);
actionBinder.addBinding().to(BarAction.class);
Then you can @Inject the Set<Action> anywhere.
回答2:
Let me show you what I consider an even better way of multibinding things. If you want Actions to be pluggable and let anyone add them, it's often useful to provide a simple Module for someone to use that hides needing to instantiate the Multibinder. Here's an example:
public abstract class ActionModule extends AbstractModule {
private Multibinder<Action> actionBinder;
@Override protected void configure() {
actionBinder = Multibinder.newSetBinder(binder(), Action.class);
configureActions();
}
/**
* Override this method to call {@link #bindAction}.
*/
protected abstract void configureActions();
protected final LinkedBindingBuilder<Action> bindAction() {
return actionBinder.addBinding();
}
}
Now why is this better? It allows someone to use an ActionModule from anywhere to add more Actions via the standard binding API. I think it's more readable. Here's an example usage:
public final class MyStandardActionModule extends ActionModule() {
@Override protected void configureActions() {
bindAction().to(FooAction.class);
bindAction().to(BarAction.class);
// If you need to instantiate an action through a Provider, do this.
bindAction().toProvider(BazActionProvider.class);
// You can also scope stuff:
bindAction().to(MySingletonAction.class).in(Singleton.class);
}
}
This pattern of using a Module to hide the multibinder is used in Guice code. It's a little work up front, but keeps things clean. You can also do something similar for a MapBinder if you need to. Keep in mind you can instantiate as many ActionModules as you want.
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/4410712/injecting-collection-of-classes-with-guice