FLAG_CANCEL_CURRENT or FLAG_UPDATE_CURRENT

笑着哭i 提交于 2019-12-18 04:03:23

问题


My app sets a repeating alarm on user interaction, it might change the interval time set for the broadcast with Alarm Manager.
There is not much in the way of extras.
Is the update or cancel flag better in this case?

Thanks


回答1:


If you are not using extras, you don't have to specify any of those flags. They only change how the systems handles extras with a PendingIntent: replace the ones in the current matching (cached by the system PendingIntent) or cancel it and create a new one. Refer to the documentation for details: http://developer.android.com/reference/android/app/PendingIntent.html#FLAG_CANCEL_CURRENT




回答2:


Never use FLAG_CANCEL_CURRENT with PendingIntents that you use when setting alarms. If you want to reschedule the alarm for a different time you don't need any flag at all; just create a duplicate PendingIntent with flags of zero and then use it to set() an alarm: this will implicitly cancel the existing alarm and then set it for the newly-specified time. If you used FLAG_CANCEL_CURRENT when you created the new PendingIntent, though, it breaks the Alarm Manager's ability to recognize that it's "the same" as the now-canceled PendingIntent, and you wind up with the old one hanging around, undeliverable, taking up memory and CPU. I've seen apps with this bug rack up literally hundreds of stale alarms in the system, enough to be a noticeable performance and memory-usage hit.

If you just want to change the extras without actually rescheduling the existing alarm, that is what FLAG_UPDATE_CURRENT is for. If you want to reschedule, don't use any flags at all.



来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/14029400/flag-cancel-current-or-flag-update-current

易学教程内所有资源均来自网络或用户发布的内容,如有违反法律规定的内容欢迎反馈
该文章没有解决你所遇到的问题?点击提问,说说你的问题,让更多的人一起探讨吧!