Is there anything wrong with using T & F instead of TRUE & FALSE?

时光总嘲笑我的痴心妄想 提交于 2019-12-17 07:51:30

问题


I noticed that using T and F instead of TRUE and FALSE in functions in R gives me the same results. Of course, T and F are more concise, yet, I see TRUE and FALSE being used more often.

I was wondering whether there is any difference between the two? Is there anything wrong with using T and F?


回答1:


T and F can be re-defined, but TRUE and FALSE are reserved words and cannot be re-defined.

> TRUE <- 1L
Error in TRUE <- 1L : invalid (do_set) left-hand side to assignment
> FALSE <- 0L
Error in FALSE <- 0L : invalid (do_set) left-hand side to assignment
> T <- F  # yikes, this would be hard to debug!

Personally, I sometimes use T and F when I use R interactively, but I never use them in production code or packages.



来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/18256639/is-there-anything-wrong-with-using-t-f-instead-of-true-false

标签
易学教程内所有资源均来自网络或用户发布的内容,如有违反法律规定的内容欢迎反馈
该文章没有解决你所遇到的问题?点击提问,说说你的问题,让更多的人一起探讨吧!