问题
Why can't we instantiate a class with a protected constructor if its child is in a different package? If protected variables and methods can be accessed, why doesn't the same rule also apply for a protected constructor?
pack1:
package pack1;
public class A {
private int a;
protected int b;
public int c;
protected A() {
a = 10;
b = 20;
c = 30;
}
}
pack2:
package pack2;
import pack1.A;
class B extends A {
public void test() {
A obj = new A(); // gives compilation error; why?
//System.out.println("print private not possible :" + a);
System.out.println("print protected possible :" + b);
System.out.println("print public possible :" + c);
}
}
class C {
public static void main(String args[]) {
A a = new A(); // gives compilation error; why?
B b = new B();
b.test();
}
}
回答1:
According to the Java Spec (https://docs.oracle.com/javase/specs/jls/se8/html/jls-6.html#jls-6.6.2.2)
6.6.2.2. Qualified Access to a
protectedConstructorLet
Cbe the class in which aprotectedconstructor is declared and letSbe the innermost class in whose declaration the use of theprotectedconstructor occurs. Then:
If the access is by a superclass constructor invocation
super(...), or a qualified superclass constructor invocationE.super(...), whereEis a Primary expression, then the access is permitted.If the access is by an anonymous class instance creation expression
new C(...){...}, or a qualified anonymous class instance creation expressionE.new C(...){...}, whereEis a Primary expression, then the access is permitted.If the access is by a simple class instance creation expression
new C(...), or a qualified class instance creation expressionE.new C(...), whereEis a Primary expression, or a method reference expressionC :: new, whereCis a ClassType, then the access is not permitted. Aprotectedconstructor can be accessed by a class instance creation expression (that does not declare an anonymous class) or a method reference expression only from within the package in which it is defined.
In your case, access to the protected constructor of A from B would be legal from a constructor of B through an invocation of super(). However, access using new is not legal.
回答2:
JLS 6.6.7 answers your question. A subclass only access a protected members of its parent class, if it involves implementation of its parent. Therefore , you can not instantiate a parent object in a child class, if parent constructor is protected and it is in different package...
6.6.7 Example: protected Fields, Methods, and Constructors Consider this example, where the points package declares:
package points;
public class Point {
protected int x, y;
void warp(threePoint.Point3d a) {
if (a.z > 0) // compile-time error: cannot access a.z
a.delta(this);
}
}
and the threePoint package declares:
package threePoint;
import points.Point;
public class Point3d extends Point {
protected int z;
public void delta(Point p) {
p.x += this.x; // compile-time error: cannot access p.x
p.y += this.y; // compile-time error: cannot access p.y
}
public void delta3d(Point3d q) {
q.x += this.x;
q.y += this.y;
q.z += this.z;
}
}
which defines a class Point3d. A compile-time error occurs in the method delta here: it cannot access the protected members x and y of its parameter p, because while Point3d (the class in which the references to fields x and y occur) is a subclass of Point (the class in which x and y are declared), it is not involved in the implementation of a Point (the type of the parameter p). The method delta3d can access the protected members of its parameter q, because the class Point3d is a subclass of Point and is involved in the implementation of a Point3d. The method delta could try to cast (§5.5, §15.16) its parameter to be a Point3d, but this cast would fail, causing an exception, if the class of p at run time were not Point3d.
A compile-time error also occurs in the method warp: it cannot access the protected member z of its parameter a, because while the class Point (the class in which the reference to field z occurs) is involved in the implementation of a Point3d (the type of the parameter a), it is not a subclass of Point3d (the class in which z is declared).
回答3:
I agree with previous posters, don't know why you would want to do this (instantiate parent in that way in extending class) but you could even do something like this:
public void test() {
A obj = new A(){}; // no compilation error; why? you use anonymous class 'override'
...
回答4:
Why do you need A obj=new A(); in class, whereas object of class b is itself an object of class A
And in class c it is giving error because, you are accessing the protected property of class A which is constructor.
To get object of class A in this case you must use this function in class A
static A getInstance()
{
A obj = new A(); // create obj of type A.
return obj; // returns that object by this method. No need to use 'New' kind of instantiation.
}
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/5150748/protected-constructor-and-accessibility