问题
Mercurial tracks the contents of a file throughout renames (hg mv $OLD $NEW), so that hg annotate $NEW also shows up the line-wise changes formerly made to $OLD with their original identification. That works fine.
BUT there seems no straightforward way to find out the name of the $OLD file, to which some given line has belonged within the ancestry of $NEW. hg annot $NEW -r$REV only works down to the rename changeset.
Of course the information is somehow accessible, e. g. by crawling through hg log (without --follow) and identifying the renames with some hg log -r$RENAMEREV -g -p (or by clicking through hg serve's web interface).
But this “workflow” is not only annoying and error-prone, but [most importantly] it isn't non-interactive/scriptable.
My question: Is there a way to get/construct either
- some list of the file name history of
$NEW(best with respective revision ranges), or - the name of the file in which line
$LINEwas commited (some kind of filename option forhg annot)?
Ideas in either the hg CLI or Python/hglib appreciated.
回答1:
Either include the {file_copies} keyword in your hg log template:
$ hg init demo
$ cd demo
$ touch a
$ hg ci -Am 'file a'
adding a
$ hg mv a b
$ hg ci -Am 'moved to file b'
$ hg log -r . -T"{file_copies}\n"
b (a)
The built-in template status will include file copy info when you set the --copies flag:
$ hg log -r 1 -Tstatus --copies
changeset: 1:b37952faaddc
tag: tip
user: Martijn Pieters <mjpieters@fb.com>
date: Sun Jul 31 16:07:04 2016 +0100
summary: moved to file b
files:
A b
a
R a
So file b was taken from a.
See hg help template for more things you can include in log output.
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/38685228/mercurial-identify-file-name-after-rename