问题
I have a block of code like this that runs as a child thread:
if(someVar == 1){
doSomeStuff;
_exit(0)
}
else
execvp(*(temp->_arguments), temp->_arguments);
printf("I'm done\n");
When I run the program with someVar == 1, I understand that the _exit(0) call kills my thread. However, when it's set to 0, why doesn't the program continue after the execvp() call and do the printf statement?
回答1:
If you exec* (call any exec function from the exec family), then the code of a new program is loaded into your current process and execution continues with its main function and its stuff. On a successful execution of those functions, they will never return because your printf
does not exist anymore in memory.
I think you confuse exec*
with the fork function. That will splice off a new child process which will run the same code as the parent.
If what you want is to create a new thread, that shares data and the address space with the main thread, you should use the pthread_create function. A new process will not share data and you will have to communicate with the other process using other mechanisms, like pipes or shared memory.
回答2:
execvp() overwrites your program with the new executable and doesn't return, unless an error occurs. You need to fork() first and then call exec* on the child process.
回答3:
because execvp
replaces the process you were running with the process you exec'ed. If execvp returns, it's because it failed. It shouldn't return otherwise.
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/658431/after-execvp-returns-why-doesnt-my-program-pick-up-where-it-left-off