问题
In the following code:-
RxJS.Observable.of(1,2).first().subscribe((x) => console.log(x););
is it necessary to unsubscribe given the operator first()
?
回答1:
No. It unsubscribes automatically after calling first()
. The current syntax is observable.pipe(first()).subscribe(func);
for RxJS 6.
回答2:
For the example provided, you dont need to unsubscribe
, and neither you need to call first
, as Observable.of(1)
actually completes after emitting its first (and last) value.
回答3:
first()
will complete after the first item is emitted from the observable.
Also subscribe()
takes three arguments, the last one being the complete callback. Running the following code will output 1 followed by 'done'.
Rx.Observable.of(1)
.subscribe(
(x) => console.log(x), // next
(x) => console.error(x), // error
() => console.log('done') // done
)
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/49683600/any-need-to-call-unsubscribe-for-rxjs-first