Spock Mock not working for unit test

旧街凉风 提交于 2019-12-08 05:06:39

问题


I am getting weird results from a Spock unit test that I thought was being caused by a misuse of Groovy's TupleConstructor annotation. However, thanks to the help of another user, I see it is a problem with the way Spock is creating mocks. Although I have fixed the issue by replacing the injected mocks with real instances, I need to in fact get mocks working here.

My main classes:

@Canonical
@TupleConstructor(callSuper = true)
abstract class Vehicle {
    Long id
}

@Canonical
@TupleConstructor(callSuper = true, includeSuperProperties = true)
abstract class Foobaz extends Vehicle {
    String name
    String label
    String description
}

@Canonical
@TupleConstructor(callSuper = true, includeSuperProperties = true)
class Fizz extends Foobaz {
    // This is an empty class that creates a meaningful name over the
    // abstract Foobaz parent class. This may seem like bad design in
    // this analogy, but I assure you it makes sense (from a Domain-Driven
    // Design perspective) in my actual application.
}

@Canonical
@TupleConstructor(callSuper = true, includeSuperProperties = true)
class Car extends Vehicle {
    Fizz fizz1
    Fizz fizz2

    @Override
    String toString() {
        "${fizz1.name} - ${fizz2.name}"
    }
}

My Spock test:

class CarSpec extends Specification {
    def "toString() generates a correct string"() {
        given: "a Car with some mocked dependencies"
        String f1 = 'fizzy'
        String f2 = 'buzzy'
        Fizz fizz1 = Mock(Fizz)
        Fizz fizz2 = Mock(Fizz)

        fizz1.name >> f1
        fizz2.name >> f2

        Car car = new Car(1L, fizz1, fizz2)

        when: "we call toString()"
        String str = car.toString()

        then: "we get a correctly formatted string"
        "${f1} - ${f2}" == str
    }
}

But when I run this I get the following failure/error:

Condition not satisfied:

"${f1} - ${f2}" == str
  |        |     |  |
  fizzy    buzzy |  null - null
                 false
                 <omitting details here for brevity>

Expected :null - null

Actual   :fizzy - buzzy

Any ideas where I'm going awry?


回答1:


From our discussion on a different one of @smeeb's questions, I looked into this a bit more since I was very confused why this wasn't working.

I created my own test.

class SomeTest extends Specification {

    static class Driver {

        String getName(Superclass superclass) {
            return superclass.name
        }
    }

    static abstract class Superclass {
        String name
    }

    static class Subclass extends Superclass {
    }


    def 'test'() {
        given:
        def driver = new Driver()
        def subclass = Mock(Subclass)

        subclass.name >> 'test'

        expect:
        driver.getName(subclass) == 'test'
    }
}

It failed with the same problem that @smeeb saw.

driver.getName(subclass) == 'test'
|      |       |         |
|      null    |         false
|              Mock for type 'Subclass' named 'subclass'

I tried changing a few different things and found that when I either removed the abstract modifier from Superclass or changed the return superclass.name to return superclass.getName() the test began working.

It seems there is a weird interaction on the Groovy-level between getting inherited public fields from an abstract superclass using the auto-generated accessors.

So, in your case either remove abstract modifier from FooBaz, or change your code to:

@Override
String toString() {
    "${fizz1.getName()} - ${fizz2.getName()}"
}



回答2:


If you change your specification to this:

class CarSpec extends Specification {
    def "toString() generates a correct string"() {
        given: "a Car with some mocked dependencies"
        String f1 = 'fizzy'
        String f2 = 'buzzy'
        Fizz fizz1 = Mock()
        Fizz fizz2 = Mock()

        Car car = new Car(1L, fizz1, fizz2)

        when: "we call toString()"
        String str = car.toString()

        then: "we get a correctly formatted string + getProperty('name') is called once on each Mock"
        "$f1 - $f2" == str

        1 * fizz1.getProperty('name') >> f1
        1 * fizz2.getProperty('name') >> f2
    }
}

So you define the interactions in the then block, then it should all work fine...



来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/35656949/spock-mock-not-working-for-unit-test

标签
易学教程内所有资源均来自网络或用户发布的内容,如有违反法律规定的内容欢迎反馈
该文章没有解决你所遇到的问题?点击提问,说说你的问题,让更多的人一起探讨吧!