Single producer/consumer circular buffer which only blocks consumer

问题

I'd like to implement a buffer with single producer and a single consumer, where only the consumer may be blocked. Important detail here is that the producer can drop the update if the queue is full.

I've considered converting a wait-free implementation, but at first glance there seems to be no easy way to notify the consumer new data has arrived without losing notifications. So I settled on the very simple approach below, using a counting semaphore (some error handling details omitted for clarity):

Object ar[SIZE];
int head = 0, tail = 0;
sem_t semItems; // initialized to 0

void enqueue(Object o) {
    int val;
    sem_getvalue(&semItems, &val);
    if (val < SIZE - 1) {
        ar[head] = o;
        head = (head + 1) % SIZE;
        sem_post(&semItems);
    }
    else {
       // dropped
    }
}
Object dequeue(void) {
    sem_wait(&semItems);
    Object o = ar[tail];
    tail = (tail + 1) % SIZE;
    return o;
}

Are there any safety issues with this code? I was surprised not to see an implementation like it anywhere in the popular literature. An additional question is whether sem_post() would ever block (calls futex_wake() under the hood in linux). Simpler solutions are also welcome of course.

edit: edited code to leave a space between reader and writer (see Mayurk's response).

回答1:

I can see one problem in this implementation. Consider the following sequence.

Assume buffer is full, but consumer is not yet started. So (head=0, tail=0, sem_val=SIZE).
dequeue() is called from consumer thread. sem_wait() succeeds. So just at that instance (head=0, tail=0, sem_val=SIZE-1). Consumer starts reading ar[0].
Now there is a thread switch. enqueue() is called from producer thread. sem_getvalue() would return SIZE-1. So producer writes at ar[0].

Basically I think you need mutex protection for reading and writing operations. But adding mutex might block the threads. So I am not sure whether you get expected behavior from this logic.

来源：https://stackoverflow.com/questions/40757091/single-producer-consumer-circular-buffer-which-only-blocks-consumer

标签

multithreading

pthreads

semaphore