Binding XML in Silverlight without nominal classes

Question

Let's say I have a simple chunck of XML:-

<root>
   <item forename="Fred" surname="Flintstone" />
   <item forename="Barney" surname="Rubble" />
</root>

Having fetched this XML in Silverlight I would like to bind it with XAML of this ilke:-

<ListBox x:Name="ItemList" Style="{StaticResource Items}">
    <ListBox.ItemTemplate>
        <DataTemplate>
            <StackPanel Orientation="Horizontal">           
                <TextBox Text="{Binding Forename}" />
                <TextBox Text="{Binding Surname}" />  
            </StackPanel>
        </DataTemplate>
    </ListBox.ItemTemplate>
</ListBox> 

Now I can bind simply enough with LINQ to XML and a nominal class:-

public class Person {
     public string Forename {get; set;} 
     public string Surname {get; set;}
}

Can it be done without this class?

In other words, coupling between the Silverlight code and the input XML is limited to the XAML only, other source code is agnostic to the set of attributes on the item element.

Edit: The use of XSD is suggested but ultimately it amounts the same thing. XSD->Generated class.

Edit: An anonymous class doesn't work, Silverlight can't bind them.

Edit: This needs to be two way, the user needs to be able to edit the values and these values end up in the XML. (Changed original TextBlock to TextBox in sample above.)

Answer 1

See Binding to Anonymous types in Silverlight for information.

Answer 2

You can do this with an IValueConverter. Here is a simple one:

public class XAttributeConverter : IValueConverter
{
    public object Convert(object value, Type targetType, object parameter, System.Globalization.CultureInfo culture)
    {
        var xml = value as XElement;
        var name = parameter as string;
        return xml.Attribute(name).Value;
    }
}

Then in your Xaml you can reference the type converter and pass the attribute name as the parameter:

<ListBox x:Name="ItemList">
    <ListBox.Resources>
        <local:XAttributeConverter x:Name="xcvt" />
    </ListBox.Resources>
    <ListBox.ItemTemplate>
        <DataTemplate>
            <StackPanel Orientation="Horizontal">
                <TextBlock Text="{Binding Converter={StaticResource xcvt}, ConverterParameter=forename}" />
                <TextBlock Text="{Binding Converter={StaticResource xcvt}, ConverterParameter=surname}" />
            </StackPanel>
        </DataTemplate>
    </ListBox.ItemTemplate>
</ListBox>

This is when you bind to the xml loaded in an XElement:

XElement xml = XElement.Parse("<root><item forename='Fred' surname='Flintstone' /><item forename='Barney' surname='Rubble' /></root>");

ItemList.ItemsSource = xml.Descendants("item");

Not a super elegant binding syntax, but it does work and is easier than mapping to classes.

Answer 3

As far as I'm aware the Silverlight Binding lacks the XPath properties found in WPF so there is no nice way to bind directly to XML. When I've encountered this problem I've used xsd.exe against a schema to generate my classes and then use Xml Serialization to populate them. It's not ideal but at least I'm not writing and maintaining the classes and mappings myself.

Answer 4

Could you do something similar to what Bryant is suggesting with a query that uses an anonymous class?

i.e.:

var data = from c in xml.Descendants("item")
                       select new  { Forename = c.Attribute("forename").Value, 
                                     Surname = c.Attribute("surname").Value };
ItemList.ItemsSource = data

I think this should work, but I'm not somewhere I could test it out. If it doesn't, somebody let me know why because now I'm interested.