xml-comments

Consider this piece of XML: <ListBox x:Name="pictureBox" ItemsSource="{Binding}" MouseDoubleClick="item_DoubleClick" > Is there any way to comment out MouseDoubleClick="item_DoubleClick" ? This attempt fails: <ListBox x:Name="pictureBox" ItemsSource="{Binding}" <!-- MouseDoubleClick="item_DoubleClick"--> > You could just comment out the whole element, which would work, and underneath it put the modified version without that attribute. No it's not you'll have to remove it. You cannot have comments inside the declaration of an Element. It would not be possible for the parser to parse this XML at

Possible Duplicate: How to reference generic classes and methods in xml documentation i have been using the see cref tag and it works great but now i need to include a generic list of string[] in the see cref but the documentation doesn't correctly render. /// <returns>A <see cref="List<string[]>" /> that ....... I presume its something to do with the < and > and maybe [] Is this allowed, is there a work around? /// <returns>A <see cref="List{T}" /> that</returns> 来源： https://stackoverflow.com/questions/4828075/using-see-cref-with-characters-in-xml-documentation

Is it possible to comment one or several attributes inside an XML tag? Something like /* */ from C. I have tried using <!-- --> , but it was unsuccessful. <element attribute1="value1" attribute2="value2" <!-- attribute3="value3" (commented value) --> > No, this isn't possible. Comments are not allowed in an XML open tag. Depending on your application, you might get away with "commenting out" the attributes by prefixing their names with "_", or you might not (if the XML is validated against a schema or all attributes are parsed). Because whitespace is allowed, and most editors support line

I can't understand the virtues of using XML comments. I know they can be converted into nice documentation external to the code, but the same can be achieved with the much more concise DOxygen syntax. In my opinion the XML comments are wrong, because: They obfuscate the comments and the code in general. (They are more difficult to read by humans). Less code can be viewed on a single screen, because "summary" and "/summary" take additional lines. (removed) What then could have been be the reasons, why XML was preferred in .NET rather that the simple DOxygen syntax? There is not really a correct