workflow | 易学教程

Correct Git workflow for shared feature branch?

阅读更多关于 Correct Git workflow for shared feature branch?

问题 I am trying to figure out the right workflow for this situation: On the shared repo, we have these branches: -master -feature The feature branch is a shared branch, since many developers are working on a new feature together. They are actively pushing their changes to the feature branch. I'm trying to avoid 'conflict hell' for the day that feature finally gets merged back into master . Currently, I see some options: 1) Actively merge master into feature , and do it often. However, this is not

Workflow engine in Javascript [closed]

阅读更多关于 Workflow engine in Javascript [closed]

问题 Does anybody know a workflow engine (such as Spring WebFlow) for Javascript? We have a home-made framework that allows us to guide site navigation using JSON, but its quality is far from good. Edit based on given answers: the engine must run on the browser and reduce to minimum the number of requests to the server. 回答1: As suggested by katspaugh I'm posting the libraries I found as the answer. List of workflow libraries that I've found until now: XState - https://github.com/davidkpiano/xstate

How do you learn proper Emacs? [closed]

阅读更多关于 How do you learn proper Emacs? [closed]

问题 Closed . This question needs to be more focused. It is not currently accepting answers. Want to improve this question? Update the question so it focuses on one problem only by editing this post. Closed 2 years ago . I am about to learn Emacs, have been through the tutorial and borrowed the O'Reilly book on Emacs. But the question still is - how do you learn good Emacs workflow ? I guess, you don't use Emacs as you'd use, for example, Vim. This question seems revelant to mine: - Where can I

“git pull” or “git merge” between master and development branches

阅读更多关于 “git pull” or “git merge” between master and development branches

问题 I have my master branch and a develop branch for working on a few changes. I need to merge changes from master into develop , but will eventually merge everything from develop into master . I have two different workflows in mind: git pull origin master into develop branch git merge master into develop branch Which is the best way to do this, and why? 回答1: Be careful with rebase. If you're sharing your develop branch with anybody, rebase can make a mess of things. Rebase is good only for your

What is the preferred way to manage schema.rb in git?

阅读更多关于 What is the preferred way to manage schema.rb in git?

I don't want to add schema.rb to .gitignore , because I want to be able to load a new database schema from that file. However, keeping it checked in is causing all sorts of spurious conflicts that are easily resolved by a fresh db:migrate:reset . Basically I want a way to: Keep schema.rb in the repository for deploy-time database setup Keep schema.rb in '.gitignore' for general development There would be one or two people responsible for updating schema.rb and knowing that it was correct. Is there a way I can have my cake and eat it, too? What has worked really well for me is to delete and

Git: Set up a fetch-only remote?

阅读更多关于 Git: Set up a fetch-only remote?

When I run git remote -v in one of my Git repositories that has a remote(s) configured, I see that each remote has both fetch and push specs: $ git remote -v <remote-name> ssh://host/path/to/repo (fetch) <remote-name> ssh://host/path/to/repo (push) For remotes that point to peer developers there's no need to push, and Git will refuse to push to a non-bare repository anyway. Is there any way to configure these remotes as "fetch-only" with no push address or capabilities? Daniel Brockman I don't think you can remove the push URL, you can only override it to be something other than the pull URL.

When to use Windows Workflow Foundation? [closed]

阅读更多关于 When to use Windows Workflow Foundation? [closed]

Some things are easier to implement just by hand (code), but some are easier through WF. It looks like WF can be used to create (almost) any kind of algorithm. So (theoretically) I can do all my logic in WF, but it's probably a bad idea to do it for all projects. In what situations is it a good idea to use WF and when will it make things harder then they have to be? What are pros and cons/cost of WF vs. coding by hand? Panos You may need WF only if any of the following are true: You have a long-running process. You have a process that changes frequently. You want a visual model of the process.

Workflow description for git usage for in-house development

阅读更多关于 Workflow description for git usage for in-house development

问题 The company I work for wants to have monthly releases, and I am trying to convince them to switch to git. I believe the proper git-way to handle this is to have a integration branch for each release (i.e. monthly) and have feature branches off the integration branches for new development and changes. The environment is loaded with interdependencies and sometimes a feature has to be postponed to a different month because of delays in required features from other external systems. The projects

How do you combine “Revision Control” with “Workflow” for R?

阅读更多关于 How do you combine “Revision Control” with “Workflow” for R?

问题 I remember coming across R users writing that they use "Revision control" (e.g: "Source control"), and I am curious to know: How do you combine "Revision control" with your statistical analysis workflow? Two (very) interesting discussions talk about how to deal with the workflow. But neither of them refer to the revision control element: How to organize large R programs? Workflow for statistical analysis and report writing A Long Update To The Question : Following some of the people's answers

How can I get my C code to automatically print out its Git version hash?

阅读更多关于 How can I get my C code to automatically print out its Git version hash?

问题 Is there an easy way to write C code that can access its Git version hash? I wrote software in C to collect scientific data in a laboratory setting. My code records the data it collects in a .yaml file for later analysis. My experiments change from day-to-day and I often have to modify the code. To keep track of revisions, I use a git repository. I would like to be able to include the Git revision hash as a comment in my .yaml data files. That way, I could look at the .yaml file and know