workflow

as most of us surely do every now and then, I try to improve my workflow. As Eclipse is my main IDE, I wondered if it may be possible to use it without mouse. I browsed the available shortcuts and tried to use them instead of my mouse. I found interesting features like Ctrl+3 which opens something like the Apple spotlight. I know there are a lot of questions concerning favorite shortcuts etc. but I'd like to know if it works because at the moment it feels a bit squishy 100% without mouse. So is anyone out there using Eclipse like that? And are there some hints to ease the change? Yes, it is

I'm searching for a workflow library/framework for Python. I'm astonished that there I cannot find anything which is simple and not attached to Zope/Plone. Does anyone know of an open-source, simple workflow library/framework. It's preferred to support Django, but not required. Try GoFlow , a workflow engine for Django. Unfortunately it seems like most/all of the projects listed here are no longer active. Here's a new project which is currently ongoing: http://packages.python.org/django-workflows/overview.html Another workflow project that I saw recently was repoze.workflow, which is a state

Pre-warning : There are some other questions similar to this but don't quite answer the question (these include: Alternatives to Windows Workflow Foundation? , Can anyone recommend a .Net open source alternative to Windows Workflow? ) We are developing a system that is an event based state machine, currently we are investigating windows workflow, our system needs to be low latency in its response to events from a multitude of sources (xmpp, http, sms, phone call, email etc etc) coming into the system, scalable and resilient and most importantly customisable. For a variety of reasons (and due

I just don't get it. I thought, Bundler was developed to resolve version conflicts between gems. So that I just have to require "bundler/setup" and everything is fine, knowing that Bundler will load the correct versions of all my gems and their dependencies. Now, RVM is great for managing multiple Rubies, I know, but why should I care about the Gemset feature? Do I miss something here? Can it make my development even easier? Maybe, some of you can give me some hints on the perfect RVM + Bundler workflow for both, development and production. I also don't know when RVM starts switching to

I am looking to implement (or build as a last resort) a type of survey engine that allows for extensibility and integration into an existing workflow engine. The survey/questionnaire engine should allow for admin users to add new questions and response types (text/bool/multiple/etc), should use SQL Server for persistence and ASP.NET 2.0 or greater. It should leverage AD for Windows Integrated Auth and security. Does anyone know of a good (free or cheap is even better) off-the shelf solution that meets these basic requirements? Maybe these articles might be useful if you decide to build your

as I usually don't do the up front design of my models in Django projects I end up modifying the models a lot and thus deleting my test database every time (because "syncdb" won't ever alter the tables automatically for you). Below lies my workflow and I'd like to hear about yours. Any thoughts welcome.. Modify the model. Delete the test database. (always a simple sqlite database for me.) Run "syncdb". Generate some test data via code. goto 1. A secondary question regarding this.. In case your workflow is like above, how do you execute the 4. step? Do you generate the test data manually or is

I am trying to figure out the right workflow for this situation: On the shared repo, we have these branches: -master -feature The feature branch is a shared branch, since many developers are working on a new feature together. They are actively pushing their changes to the feature branch. I'm trying to avoid 'conflict hell' for the day that feature finally gets merged back into master . Currently, I see some options: 1) Actively merge master into feature , and do it often. However, this is not recommended in the git docs, and I'm starting to see why. When I try this, I seem to fix the same

日本是世界上唯一一个使用皇帝年号纪年的国家，自从1868年明治维新开始算起，一共经历了明治，大正，昭和，平成以及现在的令和，5个年号。每一个年号代表了一个时代，每一个时代的日本人都有各自的特点。 日本民间有一个笑话，形象的概括了每个时代的人。“明治养士，大正养国，昭和养鬼，平成养猪”。其中肩负了日本战后重建带领日本经济走向腾飞的那代人，做事认真但思想古板，把一生奉献给了公司，受到人们的普遍尊敬，被尊称为“昭和男儿”。而1989年以后出生的那代人，相当于我国的90后一代，从小受“宽松教育”，没有了父辈那代人艰苦奋斗的作风，办事极不靠谱，被称为“平成废柴”。而昭和男儿死板，机械，老古董式的工作作风也被现代年轻人所诟病。 今天介绍的这位就是工作在“昭和氛围”公司里的专门致力于RPA导入的日本女孩小美。 “你会用Gmail吗？” 在2017年11月东洋经济的报道中，「昭和氛围的公司=年轻人马上会辞职的公司」，相比工作的“质”来说，他们更追求“量”，不会表扬鼓励员工，而只是训斥迫使员工努力。 “在公司，那些牺牲了自己的个人时间加班到深夜的人，才会被领导认可，而到点下班的人则会被评价成不努力工作的人。”小美苦笑着说。 “公司里的很多文件都是手写的，一笔一划认真地写字会被表扬，然后整齐地把文件归档放到柜子里，完全没有PDF管理的概念。”看到这里连笔者都震惊了，都9012了，日本还有这样的公司

This question pertains not only to how to accomplish this task, but to whether doing so is good or bad practice with Git. Consider that locally I do most work on the master branch, but I have created a topical branch I will call "topical_xFeature". In the process of working on "topical_xFeature" and switching back and forth to do other work on the master branch, it turns out that I have made more than one commit on the "topical_xFeature" branch, but between each commit, I have done no push. First , would you consider this bad practice? Would it not be wiser to stick with one commit per branch