workflow

I need to set up different permission on an object based on its workflow state. For instance, 'manager group' can edit the object only if state=draft but 'super manager group' can edit it also if state=validated. It seems that's not possible using ir.model.access and I'm evaluating if it could be done using ir.rule . It seems not... Is there a official way to get this or do I need to implement this feature (maybe by adding a condition into ir.model.access machinery). odony This is not possible by default with ir.model.access , because this permission model is designed to act like simple Unix

In large Libre Source software projects, versioned with Mercurial or similar DVCS tools, which of the following is considered to be more conventional: Keeping the latest "stable" version of the software in the default branch. Tagging each release in default so you know which revision got packaged up as a download. Merging patches into default as soon as they are tested. Keeping new features, etc. in named branches to be merged into default on the next release. Keeping each release in a named branch, or similar. Using default to keep bleeding-edge code that's only intended to be run by

Currently we have a sequential workflow in sharepoint 2010 that has a delay activity. The delay is set to five minutes. The workflow checks on the status of five tasks and depending on the results, it either delays or completes. I have a workflow history log item set to write right before the delay and right after the delay. Sometimes the delay does not fire, an example would be as follows: Delay activity fires every five minutes for 3 full days on one item, then for no particular reason it fails to wake up for 17 hours...then fires and completes. Any ideas? I have verified all of the timer

Still having a hard time getting my head wrapped around the concept of staging as it applies to Git. Can any analogies be made with SVN? What is the primary purpose of having a stage level in Git? Similarities: Files that should be part of the repository must be added in order to being tracked. Both tools use the add command to accomplish this. Adding files means to prepare a commit. Differences: Git allows some further kind of detail when adding files. You can decide to add a whole file or distinct lines of code. Adding files to the index or stage allows more flexibility. SVN automatically

I'm working on revising some existing SPD WF's and strugling with some of the concepts including why 2 appearingly alike WF's doesn't produce the same output. Are there anyone of you that has worked with SharePoint Designer / Workflows and knows any good resources (more detailed than the MSDN introductions) or tips on the matter. E.g. on debugging and how to inspect settings and how to connect information from several workflows... In other words: come up with your best SPD WF links & tips :o) I'm not able to choose another solution at the moment, so any tips are welcome. I have the USPJ

I have a situation with a larger project that has lots of modules/libraries with their respective repos. Most of these modules are dependencies of other modules which are than dependencies of a project. And now it has come to the point where the main project has several sub-projects and many of modules are being shared. Some dependencies are more than 3-4 levels deep. I have read that it is possible to update/pull submodules inside of a project, but that works only for 1st level of submodules. Let's say that those submodules have their own submodules (2nd level) and that some 1st level

How are you using svnmerge for merging and branching in svn? Specifically I ask because I have started using svnmerge to track a specific branch in a project I work on. I did svnmerge merge and ended up with lots of strange files like .merge-left , .merge-right , .working . Now, I want to see how others use it to end up learning how I can revert my changes and apply a merge the best proper way. the_mandrill If you are seing the merge-left/right/working files then it means that there's been a conflict in a merge you've tried to apply. This means that the same section of code has been changed in

Where i can find simple tutorial for Activiti Alfresco Workflow (especially with Custom Workflow) ? I'm new with Alfresco Activiti Worfklow. Thanks. I have written a tutorial on using the Activiti workflow engine that is embedded in Alfresco 4 that shows how to create custom workflows. It includes everything you need to know from setting up the workflow using the Activiti Eclipse plug-in to defining your workflow content model and wiring up everything in Spring. It includes basic hello world examples as well as a slightly more complex example that incorporates a custom task listener. The