workflow

We are implementing Plone as a document management system in a hospital setting. In doing so, the review process asks for two review steps: where nursing staff review a document where physicians review a document The problem arises when we found out that the nurses are grouped based on the types of machinery they handle (specifically types of scanners, ultrasound,...). On these machines they perform all kinds of exams, on all kinds of bodyparts. The physicians on the other hand are grouped based on bodyparts expertise. This means that a document that pertains to an ultrasound of the pelvis

I am using 'one state workflow' for image types in Plone, and it appears an anonymous user can still see an image even if it's 'publishing date' is set in the future... Is 'publishing date' ignored in 'one state workflow' for images? It also appears 'expiry date' is also ignored ie it appears when you dial up its url. Note: I am accessing the image direct via it's URL eg my.site.com/assets/images/myexpiredimage Perhaps these publish/expiry dates only useful for listings and collections etc, they dont control access and visibility? Tried to find good Plone doco on this but couldn't... happy for

When working with multiple people with git, is it better for everyone to just work in master, and merge between each other's masters, or for everyone to work in their own titled branch? As I see it, in the case of (1), although each master acts as a branch, everyone is expected to merge between each other's work with a mostly linear flow, whereas in (2), everyone is expected to merge a common master into their branch, and push changes from their branch into a common master when they are ready. Can someone with experience working on medium- to large-sized teams with git make any comments? What

I'm using NSUserAutomatorTask to launch a .workflow file, created via the Automator app in macOS 10.13. I'm passing variables to the workflow via the variables property: https://developer.apple.com/documentation/foundation/nsuserautomatortask/1418099-variables The parent app is sandboxed. The script is located in the .applicationScriptsDirectory and runs successfully when variables are not set, or when the same variables are set from the app and declared in the workflow. if let workflow = try? NSUserAutomatorTask(url: url) { workflow.variables = ["randomVariable": "value"] // NOTE workflow

MS CRM Dynamics 4.0 incorporates the MS WF engine. The built in designer allows the creation of sequential workflows whos activities have native access to CRM entities. Is it possible to: Create a state machine workflow outside of CRM (i.e. in visual studio) and import it into CRM? Have this workflow access the CRM entities? It is NOT possible to create a state machine workflow for use in MSCRM. It is also not supported to create any workflow outside of MSCRM and import it. As a work around you could write either all the logic you need into a custom workflow activity and import that into MSCRM

I'm coming from a ClearCase background where we (simply speaking) had a workflow made up of three steps where the leftmost trunk was unstable, middle trunk is Quality Assurance and the rightmost was stable. i.e.) A A A | | | B C | | /| | C | E | | / D E | / E As you can see the stable trunk contains only the versions that have been qualified. I'm having problems replicating this workflow in Git as versions B, C and D are also pushed into the QA trunk and subsequently the stable trunk. In my eyes this defeats the purpose of a "clean" trunk containing only stable versions. Now there's obviously