workflow

Should ALL locally created GIT branches be pushed to the central-repository on a daily basis? What is best-pracice workflow concerning this? We created a GIT repository to manage our large e-commerce site, which is under continual development by a large team. The central repository is at 'Beanstalk' and we have three primary branches, 'prestaging' (master), 'staging' and 'production'. All development should be merged into prestaging when it is completed locally and ready to be published. I can see pushing long-running branches to Beanstalk as well. However some of our team advocates pushing

At my workplace we use SVN for version control. I switched to git-svn when I found out about it, and recently I decided to sync some of my private branches to another remote git repo. The workflow, then, consists of rebasing from and pushing to the SVN repo via git-svn, while working on separate private feature branches that are pushed to the remote git repo so I can work on them at home if necessary. Now, every time I rebase from git-svn, my remote git repo asks to be pulled first. Sometimes, the changes don't merge cleanly when doing a pull, even though, supposedly, the remote repo should

We are in the process of selecting a workflow solution for a company that uses Microsoft products end to end. Given the news on WF4, in that it seems to be essentially a rewrite of previous versions, is it a wise move to back the current version or should we be looking elsewhere? Ie - is the current version so bad that we would not be wise to try and use it? gbanfill Haiving just launched a project which .NET 3.5 and workflow I'd say that the current release of WF is good enough to use and run with. It has helped us to get a product out quickly (we have the usual feature creep and requirements

When would the Fetch URL and Push URL not be the same for a certain remote? For example, when i run git remote show central for a remote named central, the output looks like: * remote central Fetch URL: aoberoi@example.com:/home/aoberoi/Repositories/example.git Push URL: aoberoi@example.com:/home/aoberoi/Repositories/example.git HEAD branch: master Remote branch: master tracked I just don't see why I would be fetching from and pushing to two different URLs, what type of workflow is this intended for? VonC I am not sure what you mean, since your example includes 2 identical URL, but URLS for

可以将文章内容翻译成中文,广告屏蔽插件可能会导致该功能失效(如失效，请关闭广告屏蔽插件后再试): 问题: How do I concatenate Strings with C/C++? I tried the following ways: PS: errorInfo is a char * I should return it. errorInfo = strcat("Workflow: ", strcat( workflowToString(workflow).utf8(), strcat(" ERROR: ", errorCode.utf8))); sprintf(errorInfo, "Workflow %s ERROR: %s", workflowToString(workflow).utf8(), errorCode.utf8()); errorInfo = "Workflow: " + workflowToString(workflow).utf8() + " ERROR: " + errorCode.utf8; Just the sprintf compiles but when running my application crash. PS: I'm using NDK from Android 回答1: According to this page

可以将文章内容翻译成中文,广告屏蔽插件可能会导致该功能失效(如失效，请关闭广告屏蔽插件后再试): 问题: I've heard rumors that the Windows Workflow team is re-implementing a lot of the existing framework for the next release. My company has a couple projects that would probably work really well with Workflow, and I'm familiar with the basics of the framework now, but I'm concerned that if we try to start implementing these in WF now, we'll end up regretting it when things supposedly get better in the near future. Should we wait for the next major release of workflow, or should we start exploring it now to better prepare ourselves? 回答1: Read

I'm trying to develop some SharePoint workflows for the company I work for, and I'm not too familiar with the ins and outs of the technology. Normally when I want to familiarize myself with something, I just play with it, look at the properties, find all the methods, etc. When I fire up Visual Studio and try to create a SharePoint workflow, it gives me an error indicating I don't have a reference to "Microsoft.SharePoint.dll". Someone told me that it was normal to see that because you have to do all your development on the SharePoint Server itself if you want to do workflows. Is this true? If

可以将文章内容翻译成中文,广告屏蔽插件可能会导致该功能失效(如失效，请关闭广告屏蔽插件后再试): 问题: I'm trying to publish to Docker from my Jenkins Pipeline but most things I try result in an error. My latest try was this: docker.withDockerRegistry('https://docker-registry.myco.com/lsacco/swagger-rest', 'docker-credential') { def image = docker.image(APPLICATION_NAME); image.tag("latest"); image.push() } When I run this, Jenkins outputs this error: org.jenkinsci.plugins.scriptsecurity.sandbox.RejectedAccessException: Scripts not permitted to use method groovy.lang.GroovyObject invokeMethod java.lang.String java.lang.Object (org.jenkinsci