webget | 易学教程

Can't pass in “%26” to a WebGet UriTemplate variable in a WCF service?

阅读更多关于 Can't pass in “%26” to a WebGet UriTemplate variable in a WCF service?

问题 I have a WCF service with this declared operation: [WebGet(UriTemplate = "Test/{*testString}")] public String Test(String testString) { return testString; } However when attempting to invoke the URL Test/You%26Me , IIS returns an error: A potentially dangerous Request.Path value was detected from the client (&). My goal is to allow an ampersand in the URI via its URL-Encoding: %26 The wildcard did not help. Is there any way to prevent this error without disabling security features? 回答1: Try

Can't pass in “%26” to a WebGet UriTemplate variable in a WCF service?

阅读更多关于 Can't pass in “%26” to a WebGet UriTemplate variable in a WCF service?

WCF WebGet and ICollection<>

阅读更多关于 WCF WebGet and ICollection

问题 I'm attempting to return a generic ICollection from a REST WCF service. Should the following be possible? [ServiceContract] public class WebConfigurationManager { [WebGet] [OperationContract] public ICollection<string> GetStrings() { return new string[] { "A", "B", "C" }; } } When I attempt to execute this operation from my web browser, I get an error. Looking through my WCF trace shows me this: Cannot serialize parameter of type 'System.String[]' (for operation 'GetStrings', contract

REST methods not accessible when hosting wcf service in IIS

阅读更多关于 REST methods not accessible when hosting wcf service in IIS

问题 I have a WCF REST service that exposes a method in class GreetService: [ServiceContract] public class GreetService { [WebGet(UriTemplate = "greet/{name}")] public String GreetName(string name) { return "Hello " + name; } } Also, I registered a route in Global.asax: RouteTable.Routes.Add(new ServiceRoute("GreetService", new WebServiceHostFactory(), typeof(GreetService))); Now when i run this directly from visual studio, I am able to leverage the UriTemplate and invoke this method using a GET

Is WebGet functionally equivalent to WebInvoke(Method = “GET”)?

阅读更多关于 Is WebGet functionally equivalent to WebInvoke(Method = “GET”)?

问题 This question already asks what I'm asking, but I want some clarification on the answer. The answer states that WebGet and WebInvoke are similar, and that the primary difference is the Method parameter. But if the Method parameter is set to "GET" , is it actually functionally equivalent, or are there other differences? 回答1: They are simply marker attributes and end up being 100% functionally equivalent. The only thing that interprets these attributes is the WebHttpBehavior::GetWebMethod

WCF WebGetAttribute vs WebInvokeAttribute

阅读更多关于 WCF WebGetAttribute vs WebInvokeAttribute

问题 Is the WebGetAttribute just syntactic sugar for the WebInvokeAttribute with Method = "GET"? Or is there an underlying difference? 回答1: Your immediate observation that WebGet and WebInvoke are very similar is not all too far from the truth. WebGet, as you've already stated, applies to the HTTP GET verb while WebInvoke can be used to apply to all the other verbs (PUT, POST, DELETE, etc). Many of the parameters in WebInvoke mirror those in WebGet. BodyStyle, RequestFormat, ResponseFormat, and

Is WebGet functionally equivalent to WebInvoke(Method = “GET”)?

阅读更多关于 Is WebGet functionally equivalent to WebInvoke(Method = “GET”)?

This question already asks what I'm asking, but I want some clarification on the answer. The answer states that WebGet and WebInvoke are similar, and that the primary difference is the Method parameter. But if the Method parameter is set to "GET" , is it actually functionally equivalent, or are there other differences? They are simply marker attributes and end up being 100% functionally equivalent. The only thing that interprets these attributes is the WebHttpBehavior::GetWebMethod method and its functionality is simply: internal static string GetWebMethod(OperationDescription od) {

WCF WebGetAttribute vs WebInvokeAttribute

阅读更多关于 WCF WebGetAttribute vs WebInvokeAttribute

Is the WebGetAttribute just syntactic sugar for the WebInvokeAttribute with Method = "GET"? Or is there an underlying difference? Your immediate observation that WebGet and WebInvoke are very similar is not all too far from the truth. WebGet, as you've already stated, applies to the HTTP GET verb while WebInvoke can be used to apply to all the other verbs (PUT, POST, DELETE, etc). Many of the parameters in WebInvoke mirror those in WebGet. BodyStyle, RequestFormat, ResponseFormat, and UriTemplate are all present for both WebGet and WebInvoke. The one differentiator is the presence of the

WCF ResponseFormat For WebGet

阅读更多关于 WCF ResponseFormat For WebGet

WCF offers two options for ResponseFormat attribute in WebGet annotation in ServiceContract. [ServiceContract] public interface IService1 { [OperationContract] [WebGet(UriTemplate = "greet/{value}", BodyStyle = WebMessageBodyStyle.Bare)] string GetData(string value); [OperationContract] [WebGet(UriTemplate = "foo", BodyStyle = WebMessageBodyStyle.Bare, ResponseFormat = WebMessageFormat.Json)] string Foo(); The options for ResponseFormat are WebMessageFormat.Json and WebMessageFormat.Xml. Is it possible to write my own web message format? I would like that when client calls foo() method he gets

WCF ResponseFormat For WebGet

阅读更多关于 WCF ResponseFormat For WebGet

问题 WCF offers two options for ResponseFormat attribute in WebGet annotation in ServiceContract. [ServiceContract] public interface IService1 { [OperationContract] [WebGet(UriTemplate = \"greet/{value}\", BodyStyle = WebMessageBodyStyle.Bare)] string GetData(string value); [OperationContract] [WebGet(UriTemplate = \"foo\", BodyStyle = WebMessageBodyStyle.Bare, ResponseFormat = WebMessageFormat.Json)] string Foo(); The options for ResponseFormat are WebMessageFormat.Json and WebMessageFormat.Xml.