warnings

问题 I'm running a pyspark 2.2.0 job using the Apache Spark local mode and see the following warning: WARN RowBasedKeyValueBatch: Calling spill() on RowBasedKeyValueBatch. Will not spill but return 0. What could be the reason for this warning? Is this something I should care about or can I safely ignore it? 回答1: As indicated here this warning means that your RAM is full and that part of the RAM contents are moved to disk. See also the Spark FAQ Does my data need to fit in memory to use Spark? No.

问题 I'm getting a wall of warnings similar to the following in my build: No way to resolve conflict between "Newtonsoft.Json, Version=7.0.0.0" and "Newtonsoft.Json, Version=6.0.0.0". Choosing "Newtonsoft.Json, Version=7.0.0.0" arbitrarily. I get additional warnings for the following dlls (repeats are intentional): Microsoft.Owin System.Web.Http Newtonsoft.Json System.Net.Http.Formatting Microsoft.Owin Microsoft.ApplicationInsights As well as a matching message for each warning: Consider app

问题 I'm getting a wall of warnings similar to the following in my build: No way to resolve conflict between "Newtonsoft.Json, Version=7.0.0.0" and "Newtonsoft.Json, Version=6.0.0.0". Choosing "Newtonsoft.Json, Version=7.0.0.0" arbitrarily. I get additional warnings for the following dlls (repeats are intentional): Microsoft.Owin System.Web.Http Newtonsoft.Json System.Net.Http.Formatting Microsoft.Owin Microsoft.ApplicationInsights As well as a matching message for each warning: Consider app

问题 So I'm trying to write a function that prints an error message, but only on the first time the user calls the function . If they open R, load the library, and call the function, it will print a warning message. If they call the function again, it will not print this warning message. If they close R and do the same process, it will print the warning message for the first call and not on the second. I understand the idea of the basic warning() function in R, but I don't see any documentation in

问题 Did anyone resolve this issue with Ruby 2.7.0 ? I used rbenv and installed Ruby v2.7.0 and then created a Rails project using Rails v6.0.2.1 . Currently, by running one of rails s rails s -u puma rails s -u webrick the server is up and the site is served but in the Console log I see two warning messages: local:~/rcode/rb27$ rails s => Booting Puma => Rails 6.0.2.1 application starting in development => Run `rails server --help` for more startup options .rbenv/versions/2.7.0/lib/ruby/gems/2.7

问题 I have noticed that sometimes when I git pull a project, there is a message saying: "warning: redirecting to <url>" I tried searching what it means but I find nothing useful. What is it? 回答1: warning: redirecting to This is typical of a Git repo URL starting with git:// or http:// , but which is redirected at the server level to https:// (which is more secure, and allows for authentication) This is set at the server level (as in this one) with a 301 Moved Permanently. # enforce https location

问题 I have noticed that sometimes when I git pull a project, there is a message saying: "warning: redirecting to <url>" I tried searching what it means but I find nothing useful. What is it? 回答1: warning: redirecting to This is typical of a Git repo URL starting with git:// or http:// , but which is redirected at the server level to https:// (which is more secure, and allows for authentication) This is set at the server level (as in this one) with a 301 Moved Permanently. # enforce https location

问题 I have noticed that sometimes when I git pull a project, there is a message saying: "warning: redirecting to <url>" I tried searching what it means but I find nothing useful. What is it? 回答1: warning: redirecting to This is typical of a Git repo URL starting with git:// or http:// , but which is redirected at the server level to https:// (which is more secure, and allows for authentication) This is set at the server level (as in this one) with a 301 Moved Permanently. # enforce https location

问题 I have a model graph, where there is several entities that have one to many relationship with other entity. It means that inverse relationship should be one to many, but that is impossible. The core data works well without inverse relationship, The only thing that drives me crazy is warnings) Do somebody know how to avoid these specific warnings? Thanks. 回答1: Inverse Relationships Most relationships are inherently bi-directional. If a Department has a to-many relationship to the Employees