visibility

Azure Queues - Functions - Message Visibility - Workers?

余生长醉 提交于 2019-12-13 15:05:35
问题 I have some questions regarding the capabilities regarding Azure Queues, Functions, and Workers. I'm not really sure how this works. Scenario: q-notifications is an queue in an Azure storage account. f-process-notification is a function in Azure that is bound to q-notifications. Its job is to get the first message on the queue and process it. In theory when a message is added to q-notifications, the function f-process-notification should be called. Questions: Does the triggered function

Are Expression Blend design-time specific visuals possible?

陌路散爱 提交于 2019-12-13 14:54:35
问题 I'm trying to design some UserControl classes in Blend 3. I want parts of them to be "collapsed" when created at runtime, but I want to be able to edit their component parts without fiddling with code every time I want to build. It works with sample datasources, as the following example illustrates. But it doesn't appear to work with other properties... or am I doing something wrong? With a sample data source SDS_AIVertexAction We can do this in Expression Blend: <UserControl xmlns="http:/

Does `#[test]` imply `#[cfg(test)]`?

只愿长相守 提交于 2019-12-13 13:25:04
问题 Conventionally, unit tests in Rust are given a separate module, which is conditionally compiled with #[cfg(test)] : #[cfg(test)] mod tests { #[test] fn test1() { ... } #[test] fn test2() { ... } } However, I've been using a style where tests are more inline: pub fn func1() {...} #[cfg(test)] #[test] fn test_func1() {...} pub fn func2() {...} #[cfg(test)] #[test] fn test_func2() {...} My question is, does #[test] imply #[cfg(test)] ? That is, if I tag my test functions with #[test] but not #

Laravel / Eloquent Model Attribute Visibility

一世执手 提交于 2019-12-13 13:05:37
问题 Previously ORM's i've used have mapped database columns directly to class properties which allowed you to specific property visibility, just as you normally would to restrict access to certain properties e.g. passwords. With Eloquent i can't seem to replicate this because database columns are mapped to the internal attributes array which contain no visibility. My desire is to restrict the scope of access to a user password to only the object i.e. private. Setting a class property with

I cannot change control's visibility on C# code

我怕爱的太早我们不能终老 提交于 2019-12-13 07:12:35
问题 I want to change controls visibility on c#, but nothing happens. The controls are in an AspxPopupControl and 3 of them are hidden in design time, 1 of them is visible. I use this code to visible them if (paramType == "Grup") { gv_Answers.Visible = false; trlGroup.Visible = true; chkShowItems.Visible = true; } else { gv_Answers.Visible = true; trlGroup.Visible = false; chkShowItems.Visible = false; } This code is in a CustomCallBack event of a gridview. So i don't know what to do from this

controls visibility in C#

 ̄綄美尐妖づ 提交于 2019-12-13 05:08:40
问题 How to make a control visibilty to true or false. currently i am setting a panel control visibility like this in code behind. i am comparing the values of Username and UserId. If both the values are same..i am setting panel visibility to false if (UserName == UserID)) { pnl_linkbuttons.Visible = false; } is there any alternative way to set the control visibility in C# from code behind. Thanks in advance. 回答1: pnl_linkbuttons.Visible = UserName == UserID; 回答2: if you are using asp.net you

How to set the visibilty of button in a custom ListView?

痴心易碎 提交于 2019-12-13 04:44:02
问题 I have a custom ListView with a button , so when I click on a button it should disappear and it is disappearing but when I scroll down and come back the button is again appearing and a different button is getting disappeared. How can i make the specific button to disappear on clicking.... I am using this code holder.checkbox = (Button) view.findViewById(R.id.checkBox1); holder.checkbox.setOnClickListener(new View.OnClickListener() { @Override public void onClick(View v) { holder.checkbox

Binding the Visibility property of a WPF Datagrid column? Where is my fault?

萝らか妹 提交于 2019-12-13 03:49:05
问题 In a loop which sets up my WPF DataGrid columns, I want to bind the column visibility to member 'i' in my 'VisibilityList' with the following code: var bindingColumnVisibilty = new Binding(string.Format("VisibilityList[{0}]", i)); BindingOperations.SetBinding(customBoundColumn, DataGridColumn.VisibilityProperty, bindingColumnVisibilty); I have set the DataContext before the loop begins: TestControlDataGrid.TestDataGrid.DataContext = dataGridSource; The dataGridSource class contains: public

Does static provide additional guaranties in JMM context?

我与影子孤独终老i 提交于 2019-12-13 03:20:42
问题 I am reading about java singleton and I've met strange things. I will refer to following artice as example(you can easy find more) Author provides the following singleton: public class ASingleton { private static ASingleton instance = new ASingleton(); private ASingleton() { } public static ASingleton getInstance() { return instance; } } and comments: Pros: - Thread safety without synchronization - Easy to implement Cons: - Early creation of resource that might not be used in the application.

Is there a way to declare a method “friendly” in Java?

∥☆過路亽.° 提交于 2019-12-12 14:28:53
问题 I know that attributes can be set public , friendly or private to specify its visibility. Is there a way I can declare a friendly method? I want it to be accessible only from objects of classes of the same package. Thanks you, a beginner here :(. 回答1: By not entering a visiblity modifier Java uses the package private scope Check out the following article Edit: As mentioned in the comments, there is no way to mark a method as "friendly". But for your needs, package-private will suffice. 回答2: