version-control

问题 With my Java projects at present, I have full version control by declaring it as a Maven project. However I now have a Python project that I'm about to tag 0.2.0 which has no version control. Therefore should I come accross this code at a later date, I won't no what version it is. How do I add version control to a Python project, in the same way Maven does it for Java? 回答1: First, maven is a build tool and has nothing to do with version control. You don't need a build tool with Python --

问题 I have a git repository with remote foo. foo is a web app, is contains some files and dirs directly in its root: Rakefile app ... public script My main git repository is a larger system which comprises this web app. I want to pull the commits from foo, but I need the files to reside inside the web dir. So they should become web/app , web/public , etc. I don't want to use foo as a submodule. I want to merge foo into the main repository and then get rid of it. 回答1: Here's a community-wiki

问题 So right now I'm learning Ruby on Rails, and I'm working through the book "Agile Web Development with Rails". I've also decided that I want to give Mercurial a go, because I've read up on distributed SCM's, and it seems like an ideal situation. I still, however, prefer to push my code remotely to my Linux VPS just incase my hard drive decides to take a dive. So, my question is specific to branching in Mercurial. Right now I've got a remote repository set up and I can push changes over SSH

问题 I am pretty new to TFS and source control. I unable to understand the advantage of branching. Since i can do the same stuff by creating 2 folder main and development, when I am done with development.I can merge the code using any diff tool with the main branch. Then whats the point of having branches ? I know there must a huge advantage but i am unable to understand. 回答1: (UPDATE: TFS now supports git for version control so the rest of this answer no longer applies) I would google branch-per

问题 I run hg pull which added new changes to my repository. Before updating my working directory with the new changes i would like to see these new files/changes. I believe in SVN i used svn st -u but how is it done in Mercurial? 回答1: (After pulling the changes via hg pull ) you can run hg status --rev tip to show an output similar to svn st -u . 回答2: Before you even pull you can use: hg incoming --stat to see a summary of changes or hg incoming --patch to see the actual deltas. After pulling

问题 I haven't seen a continuous version control system - one that would save changes in your code as you developed them, rather than waiting for an official check in. The changes would be saved as 'not checked in' of course, but they would be saved away for backup, and viewing by others before you actually did the official check in. I haven't seen this, and wonder if it, or something like it, exists, and the reasons why it might or might not be a good idea. Right now programmers think of source

问题 A javadoc command automatically inserts a comment stating something like: <!-- Generated by javadoc (build 1.6.0_17) on Thu Apr 07 18:32:31 CEST 2011 --> in every generated HTML file. This is quite preventing change tracking for versioned javadoc, since every file will be modified when regenerating the doc. A previous question I asked convince me not to version any javadoc, but it also raised this problem and the question remains: is there a way to get rid of this comment? I did not find

问题 In the svn book it says merge 's --reintegrate is "to merge all of the source URL's changes into the working copy". I would like to merge a branch back to the trunk. Some places say that it's "absolutely necessary" to call reintegrate when merging and then delete the branch immediately afterwards, which I think is a hassle. Other places do not mention reintegration at all. I have svn 1.6.11. So I'm not sure what to do now. 回答1: A sync merge is something completely different than a

问题 I have the latest TortoiseGIT 64 bit installed on my Windows 7 64 bit machine. I noticed recently that context options are no longer coming on the files. The folders have the options such as Git commit, Rename etc...but right clicking the files, shows the menu which normally comes for un-added files such as 'Add..' only. I have checked in my repository, that these files for sure are version controlled. I have already installed 64 bit tortoisegit, latest version of git, have rebooted multiple

问题 I'm new at git so please bear with me. Say i have a file under version control that includes sensitive data. Sure enough, I put that file in my .gitignore file, so it doesn't get pushed to the repo. The problem now is somewhere in my project i have a line like #include <sensitivedata> or whatever your language of choice is. The problem is whenever somebody clones from that repo, that file is missing and he gets a fatal error when trying to build / compile the solution. So, instead of pushing