unit-testing

问题 I was trying to unit test a function in node which throws an error regardless of any condition. Here is my node function definition. public testFunction() { throw new Error('Test Error'); } As you can see this function always throws an error whenever it has been called. I tried to execute unit testing to this function using jest .toThrow(error?) method. I was not able to unit test the function as expected. The below mentioned are the test cases that I wrote and have attached the screenshot of

问题 How do i setup the UserData within the context for unit testing? var context = new Mock<IDialogContext>(); context.Setup(c => c.Activity).Returns(() => new Activity()); context.Setup(c => c.UserData).Returns(() => ?); Should i use BotData? 回答1: Used the "DialogTestBase" class from BotBuilder tests and this worked for me. IBotDataBag dataBag; var container = Build(Options.LastWriteWinsCachingBotDataStore); var msg = MakeTestMessage(); using (var scope = DialogModule.BeginLifetimeScope

问题 I have a build pipeline in Azure DevOps and I'm using the .NET Core task for applying unit testing. I need to get the result of the unit tests in variables. For example, if there are 10 tests cases and two failed, I need to get something like: failedTestCases = 2 succeededTestCases = 8 This is because I need those values in the next tasks. Is there a way to do that? To be clear, I don't need to publish the results, they are already being published, I need to get those values in execution time

问题 I have a build pipeline in Azure DevOps and I'm using the .NET Core task for applying unit testing. I need to get the result of the unit tests in variables. For example, if there are 10 tests cases and two failed, I need to get something like: failedTestCases = 2 succeededTestCases = 8 This is because I need those values in the next tasks. Is there a way to do that? To be clear, I don't need to publish the results, they are already being published, I need to get those values in execution time

问题 I'm setting up tests. I operate on test-data, then want to assure that the right value showed up in a cell in a tibble. I think there's a more concise way to this. Using the example band_instruments library(tidyverse) test_that("Musicians play instruments", { expect_equal(band_instruments %>% filter(name == "Paul") %>% pull("plays"), "bass") expect_equal({band_instruments %>% filter(name == "Keith")}$plays, "guitar") }) This works, but it's too long, too wordy. What's the most concise, yet

问题 I just try to insert a json value in h2. Then I want to get back this json value as object with hibernate converter. But the error looks like below: My insert query is: INSERT INTO log( id, activities, date) VALUES (1, '[{"actionType": "EMAIL"}]', '2019-12-10 00:00:00'); When I try to get back this field with hibernate converter, field comes with quotation mark: "[{"actionType": "EMAIL"}]" But it should be: [{"actionType": "EMAIL"}] org.springframework.dao.InvalidDataAccessApiUsageException:

问题 One can write unit tests either the classicist or the mockist way as per http://martinfowler.com/articles/mocksArentStubs.html Will writing both classist and mockist unit tests for a single method increase robustness of the code since both state and behaviour is tested? My colleagues seem to just be mocking all the way, and as they're the "example", it is assumed that I will be mocking as well unless I have a good reason not to. (I'm new to unit testing). However, I feel that testing just the

问题 I am trying to mock RequestContext and HttpServletRequest classes/interfaces but they not working. code: @Override public Object run() { String accessToken= ""; ctx = RequestContext.getCurrentContext(); HttpServletRequest request = ctx.getRequest(); String requestedServiceUri = request.getRequestURI(); //... Mock I have written //... HttpServletRequest request = Mockito.mock(HttpServletRequest.class); RequestContext requestContext = Mockito.mock(RequestContext.class); when(request.getHeader(

问题 One can write unit tests either the classicist or the mockist way as per http://martinfowler.com/articles/mocksArentStubs.html Will writing both classist and mockist unit tests for a single method increase robustness of the code since both state and behaviour is tested? My colleagues seem to just be mocking all the way, and as they're the "example", it is assumed that I will be mocking as well unless I have a good reason not to. (I'm new to unit testing). However, I feel that testing just the

问题 I am writing an auction type application with Substrate runtime. In writing test case, how can I fast forward the blockchain time (what's retrieved from <timestamp::Module<T>>::get() ) so I can reach the auction closing time and test the closing logic? Thanks. 回答1: You can just use Timestamp::set_timestamp to change the timestamp to whatever value you want. e.g. Timestamp::set_timestamp(42); You can check the tests for srml-timestamp for examples https://github.com/paritytech/substrate/blob