teardown

问题 The Python "teardown_class" is not behaving as I expect it to. Below is a summary of my code: @classmethod def setup_class(cls): cls.create_table(table1) cls.create_table(table2) cls.create_table(table3) @classmethod def create_table(cls, some_arg_here): """Some code here that creates the table""" def test_foo(self): """Some test code here""" @classmethod def teardown_class(cls): """Perform teardown things""" I believe the way it is executing is that: create_table is being called from setup

问题 jest provides afterEach , beforeEach , afterAll and beforeAll to complete setup and teardown logic. What I would like to do, is to clear up after one particular test. Consider the following: describe("a family of tests it makes sense to group together", () => { ... test("something I want to test", () => { // some setup needed for just this test global.foo = "bar" // the test expect(myTest()).toBe(true) // clear up delete global.foo } ... } The problem with the above... If the test above fails

问题 Since Xcode 10.1(maybe 10) when I create a Unit test file I don't have calls super.tearDown() and super.setUp() . I've not seen such changes in release notes. In documentation https://developer.apple.com/documentation/xctest/xctestcase/understanding_setup_and_teardown_for_test_methods are still here. So my question should I still write super.tearDown() and super.setUp()? class SomethingTests: XCTestCase { override func setUp() { // Put setup code here. This method is called before the

问题 Since Xcode 10.1(maybe 10) when I create a Unit test file I don't have calls super.tearDown() and super.setUp() . I've not seen such changes in release notes. In documentation https://developer.apple.com/documentation/xctest/xctestcase/understanding_setup_and_teardown_for_test_methods are still here. So my question should I still write super.tearDown() and super.setUp()? class SomethingTests: XCTestCase { override func setUp() { // Put setup code here. This method is called before the

来源： https://stackoverflow.com/questions/59077877/is-there-a-way-to-execute-a-teardown-function-after-all-tests-have-been-run

问题 public function tearDown() { $this->browse(function (Browser $browser) { $browser->click('#navbarDropdown') ->click('.dropdown-item'); }); parent::tearDown(); } When I apply the tearDown() method to my test class I get an error telling me the tearDown() must be compatible with Illuminate\Foundation\Testing\TestCase::tearDown() What am I doing wrong? Every time I run a test I need to login. I want to login in the setUp() method and the log out again in the tearDown, so I can execute my tests

问题 public function tearDown() { $this->browse(function (Browser $browser) { $browser->click('#navbarDropdown') ->click('.dropdown-item'); }); parent::tearDown(); } When I apply the tearDown() method to my test class I get an error telling me the tearDown() must be compatible with Illuminate\Foundation\Testing\TestCase::tearDown() What am I doing wrong? Every time I run a test I need to login. I want to login in the setUp() method and the log out again in the tearDown, so I can execute my tests

问题 I know how to check if a test failed in the afterEach() method of mocha: That's explained here: detecting test failures from within afterEach hooks in Mocha But what about the people using suite and test (tdd) instead of describe and it ?? How can I check if the current test failed here? The same code won't work because state would be undefined: teardown(async () => { // check if failed: if (this.currentTest.state === 'failed') { console.log("fail"); } }); 回答1: It seems that it works a little

问题 It's a common problem that jQuery widgets inside ASP UpdatePanels need to reinitialized after an ajax request, however my issue is that events are not unbound prior to replacing the HTML inside the UpdatePanel. jQuery takes care of this problem for you whenever you call .html("...") or .remove(), but the UpdatePanel doesn't utilize jQuery. I have popup elements (inside of the UpdatePanel), which need to be hidden when the user clicks outside of them so I made a jQuery Special Event for

问题 I need a little help understanding QUnit internas. I read its source from time to time, but i'm still writing weird test when it comes to asynchronous tests. I understand the concept of asynchronous tests, and the stop() and start() methods (and why they are needed), but when i combine them with setup and teardown i get a lot of weired situations. Here is my Testcode: use(['Psc.Exception','Psc.Code'], function () { module("async", { setup: function () { console.log('setup'); }, teardown: