synchronization

Why do we pass self in @synchronized block?

为君一笑 提交于 2019-12-03 16:24:54
问题 I guess @synchronized blocks are not object dependent but thread dependent...right? In that case why do we pass self? 回答1: @synchronized is a construct provided by the language to create synchronized scopes. As it would be highly inefficient to use a simple global shared mutex, and thus serializing every single @synchronized scope in the application, the language allows us to specify a synchronization point. Then it's up to the developer(s) to decide which synchronization points are

Getting a thread to pause - Thread.wait()/Thread.notify()

邮差的信 提交于 2019-12-03 16:15:24
I'm trying to understand how threads work, and I wrote a simple example where I want to create and start a new thread, the thread, display the numbers from 1 to 1000 in the main thread, resume the secondary thread, and display the numbers from 1 to 1000 in the secondary thread. When I leave out the Thread.wait()/Thread.notify() it behaves as expected, both threads display a few numbers at a time. When I add those functions in, for some reason the main thread's numbers are printed second instead of first. What am I doing wrong? public class Main { public class ExampleThread extends Thread {

How to implement offline capable Single Page Application with Breeze.js and HTML5 local storage

无人久伴 提交于 2019-12-03 16:00:50
I have working Single Page Application using Breeze.js for Data Access. It uses the Breeze.js to execute queries against the local cache and the data is requested only once at start up. Only the data updates are posted back on the server afterwards. I am looking for a solution to make the application connection aware. If the mobile device does not have internet connection the changes will be saved locally with Breeze.js and HTML5 local storage. When the mobile device is back online the changes will be synched to the remote data storage. Any guidelines how to implement that requirement? Thanks

Why does the acquire() method in Semaphores not have to be synchronized?

元气小坏坏 提交于 2019-12-03 14:59:00
I am getting into Semaphores in Java and was reading this article http://docs.oracle.com/javase/1.5.0/docs/api/java/util/concurrent/Semaphore.html . The only thing I don't get is why the acquire() method is not used in a synchronized context. Looking at the example from the above webiste: They create a semaphore: private Semaphore semaphore = new Semaphore(100); and get a permit just like this: semaphore.acquire(); Now, wouldn't it be possible that two or more threads try to acquire() at the same time? If so, there would be a little problem with the count. Or, does the semaphore itself handle

linux thread synchronization

一世执手 提交于 2019-12-03 14:53:37
问题 I am new to linux and linux threads. I have spent some time googling to try to understand the differences between all the functions available for thread synchronization. I still have some questions. I have found all of these different types of synchronizations, each with a number of functions for locking, unlocking, testing the lock, etc. gcc atomic operations futexes mutexes spinlocks seqlocks rculocks conditions semaphores My current (but probably flawed) understanding is this: semaphores

Using fence sync objects in OpenGL

点点圈 提交于 2019-12-03 14:07:47
I am trying to look for scenarios where Sync Objects can be used in OpenGL. My understanding is that a sync object once put in GL command stream ( using glFenceSync() ) will be signaled after all the GL commands are executed and realized. If the sync objects are synchronization primitives why can't we MANUALLY signal them ? Where exactly this functionality can help GL programmer ? Is the following scenario a correct one ? Thread 1 : Load model Draw() glFenceSync() Thread 2 : glWaitSync(); ReadPixels Use data for subsequent operation. Does this mean that I can't launch thread 2 unless

Creating synchronized stereo videos using webcams

人盡茶涼 提交于 2019-12-03 13:54:58
问题 I am using OpenCV to capture video streams from two USB webcams (Microsoft LifeCam Studio) in Ubuntu 14.04. I am using very simple VideoCapture code (source here) and am trying to at least view two videos that are synchronized against each other. I used Android stopwatch apps (UltraChron Stopwatch Lite and Stopwatch Timer) on my Samsung Galaxy S3 mini to realize that my viewed images are out of sync (show different time on stopwatch). The frames are synced maybe in 50% of the time. The frame

WatchKit Core Data Sync Up

假装没事ソ 提交于 2019-12-03 13:54:35
问题 I have an app structured as follows iOS App Writes data to Core Data which has a persistent store stored in a shared app group. The Watch Kit extension is able to read data from Core Data that was written by the iOS app. The issue I am having is if my iOS app writes data while my watch kit app is open I am not getting updates because the object context is not syncing with the data on the disk. Is there a way that since my watch kit extension is only reading data to be able to refresh the

Can rsync support One to Many syncing?

久未见 提交于 2019-12-03 13:54:13
Can I sync changes from a "model" site that I work on, across hundreds of sites on the SAME server using rsync ? I would be updating common template files and JS scripts. If possible how would I set this up? (I'm on a Hostgator Dedicated server, running Apache) The Surrican Read my extended answer for the edited question below. The most trivial and naive approach would probably to set up a script that just runs rsync for every server you want to synchronize. This is fine in most cases, but I don't think this is what you are looking for, because you would have figured that out yourself... This

Why is the volatile field copied to a local variable when doing double check locking

别来无恙 提交于 2019-12-03 13:40:55
问题 I am reading about double check locking from Effective Java . The code does the following: private volatile FieldType field; FieldType getField() { FieldType result = field; if (result == null) { // First check (no locking) synchronized(this) { result = field; if (result == null) // Second check (with locking) field = result = computeFieldValue(); } } return result; } It says that using result seems unneeded but actually ensures that the field is only read only once in the common case where