subclass

ES6 class super() with variadic arguments

点点圈 提交于 2019-11-30 13:10:24
问题 In ES6, is there a way to call a parent constructor passing through variadic arguments, a la foo.apply(this, arguments) ? I've looked for an answer, and the only instances I see are either calling super() (no arguments) or calling super(x, y) (with specific arguments). super.apply(this, arguments) doesn't appear to work. 回答1: The pattern I find convenient and follow is constructor(...args) { super(...args); } In case you have and use named arguments you could do this instead: constructor(a, b

Python print isn't using __repr__, __unicode__ or __str__ for unicode subclass?

梦想的初衷 提交于 2019-11-30 12:39:02
Python print isn't using __repr__ , __unicode__ or __str__ for my unicode subclass when printing. Any clues as to what I am doing wrong? Here is my code: Using Python 2.5.2 (r252:60911, Oct 13 2009, 14:11:59) >>> class MyUni(unicode): ... def __repr__(self): ... return "__repr__" ... def __unicode__(self): ... return unicode("__unicode__") ... def __str__(self): ... return str("__str__") ... >>> s = MyUni("HI") >>> s '__repr__' >>> print s 'HI' I'm not sure if this is an accurate approximation of the above, but just for comparison: >>> class MyUni(object): ... def __new__(cls, s): ... return

What is the correct (or best) way to subclass the Python set class, adding a new instance variable?

吃可爱长大的小学妹 提交于 2019-11-30 12:37:50
I'm implementing an object that is almost identical to a set, but requires an extra instance variable, so I am subclassing the built-in set object. What is the best way to make sure that the value of this variable is copied when one of my objects is copied? Using the old sets module, the following code worked perfectly: import sets class Fooset(sets.Set): def __init__(self, s = []): sets.Set.__init__(self, s) if isinstance(s, Fooset): self.foo = s.foo else: self.foo = 'default' f = Fooset([1,2,4]) f.foo = 'bar' assert( (f | f).foo == 'bar') but this does not work using the built-in set module.

How to add constraints on inherited properties in a grails domain sub-class

最后都变了- 提交于 2019-11-30 10:57:35
Here's what I'd like to do: class A { String string static constraints = { string(maxSize:100) } } class B extends A { static constraints = { string(url:true) } } So class A should have some constraints and B should have the same plus additional constraints on the same property. I couldn't get that to work though and I can imagine that it would clash with the Table-per-Hierarchy concept. So I tried to work around that problem by introducing a Command object with class B's constraints which can be validated in the constructor of class B. However it seems that Command objects can only be used

python subclasses

ぃ、小莉子 提交于 2019-11-30 09:36:02
I currently have a class called Polynomial, The initialization looks like this: def __init__(self, *termpairs): self.termdict = dict(termpairs) I'm creating a polynomial by making the keys the exponents and the associated values are the coefficients. To create an instance of this class, you enter as follows: d1 = Polynomial((5,1), (3,-4), (2,10)) which makes a dictionary like so: {2: 10, 3: -4, 5: 1} Now, I want to create a subclass of the Polynomial class called Quadratic. I want to call the Polynomial class constructor in the Quadratic class constructor, however im not quite sure how to do

Why can't I `End` code while I'm subclassing without breaking everything?

廉价感情. 提交于 2019-11-30 09:07:21
I've written some code in VBA to subclass a userform so that ultimately I can intercept WM_TIMER messages being dispatched to it. I'm doing this instead of specifying a TIMERPROC, as it allows me to use VBAs own error handling and calling methods to run callback functions. I'm using a userform rather than Application.hWnd because: I don't have to filter for my vs Excel/the host application's messages There are far too many messages going through Application.hWnd to be able to subclass it in a slow interpreted language like VBA When code execution is interrupted (pressing the stop button, or

Is this a reasonable way to 'subclass' a javascript array?

淺唱寂寞╮ 提交于 2019-11-30 08:22:15
问题 I realize that, strictly speaking, this is not subclassing the array type, but will this work in the way one might expect, or am I still going to run into some issues with .length and the like? Are there any drawbacks that I would not have if normal subclassing were an option? function Vector() { var vector = []; vector.sum = function() { sum = 0.0; for(i = 0; i < this.length; i++) { sum += this[i]; } return sum; } return vector; } v = Vector(); v.push(1); v.push(2); console.log(v.sum()); 回答1

iOS; programmatically collectionView with custom headers

女生的网名这么多〃 提交于 2019-11-30 06:53:04
I'm making an iOS app in swift, and I'm trying to make a collectionView programmatically. I want to use my own subclass of UICollectionReusableView as a header for the collectionview, because I need some buttons and a strechable image in the header. SupView is the UICollectionReusableView. override func viewDidLoad() { super.viewDidLoad() let layout = UICollectionViewFlowLayout() layout.headerReferenceSize = CGSizeMake(self.view.frame.width, 200) someView = SupView(frame: CGRectMake(0, 0, view.frame.width, 200)) collectionView = UICollectionView(frame: self.view.frame, collectionViewLayout:

In what ways are subtypes different from subclasses in usage?

99封情书 提交于 2019-11-30 06:24:42
问题 A subtype is established when a class is linked by means of extending or implementing. Subtypes are also used for generics. How can I differentiate subtyping from subclasses? 回答1: In Java, subclassing is a kind of subtyping. There are a number of ways Java allows subtyping: When class A extends B , A is a subtype of B because B b = new A(...); is ok. When interface A extends B , A is a subtype of B because B b = new A() { ... } is ok. When class A extends B , A[] is a subtype of B[] because B

ES6 class super() with variadic arguments

≡放荡痞女 提交于 2019-11-30 06:03:35
In ES6, is there a way to call a parent constructor passing through variadic arguments, a la foo.apply(this, arguments) ? I've looked for an answer, and the only instances I see are either calling super() (no arguments) or calling super(x, y) (with specific arguments). super.apply(this, arguments) doesn't appear to work. The pattern I find convenient and follow is constructor(...args) { super(...args); } In case you have and use named arguments you could do this instead: constructor(a, b, c) { super(...arguments); } References: https://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference