stylecop

Visual Studio Code Analysis vs StyleCop + FxCop

杀马特。学长 韩版系。学妹 提交于 2019-11-28 03:14:30
I used previously StyleCop + FxCop on my Visual Studio's projects. But now I am testing Visual Studio Code Analysis tool, which is easier to integrate into MSBuild, and I have found that this tools analyses some of the rules of both FxCop and StyleCop. Is this tool a full replacement for both FxCop and StyleCop or does it just implement some of their rules? Ben S Visual Studio includes FxCop + more. From the developer blog of FxCop : Sorry about my ignorance, but I assume FxCop is completely separate from the Code Analysis in VSTS? More specifically, I assume that if I install the new version

Code Anlysis Rule CA2000 / CA2202

。_饼干妹妹 提交于 2019-11-28 00:45:04
问题 I am trying to ensure my coding follows correct disposal of objects so I am enforcing these rules as errors. But I am having trouble with this section of code using System; using System.IO; using System.Runtime.Serialization; using System.Xml; class MyClass { public String ToXml() { var objSerializer = new DataContractSerializer(GetType()); var objStream = new MemoryStream(); StreamReader objReader; String strResult; try { // Serialize the object objSerializer.WriteObject(objStream, this); //

StyleCop SA1124 DoNotUseRegions is reasonable? [closed]

六月ゝ 毕业季﹏ 提交于 2019-11-27 23:21:38
问题 As it currently stands, this question is not a good fit for our Q&A format. We expect answers to be supported by facts, references, or expertise, but this question will likely solicit debate, arguments, polling, or extended discussion. If you feel that this question can be improved and possibly reopened, visit the help center for guidance. Closed 6 years ago . SA1124 DoNotUseRegions suggest that region should not be used anywhere. Is it really reasonable? I think region is a way to group

Stylecop vs FXcop

不羁的心 提交于 2019-11-27 19:48:10
问题 Has Stylecop superseded FXcop? Which product should we be using with Visual Studio 2008? 回答1: Stylecop is a style analysis tool that works at the source code level. It exists primarily to provide a single common style that managed projects can use to remain consistent within the larger world of managed software. It makes decisions regarding style primarily to avoid holy wars (after all, style is almost always an inherently subjective thing). I don't think I've ever met someone who liked all

Disabling StyleCop rules

筅森魡賤 提交于 2019-11-27 05:30:40
问题 I'm using StyleCop. But there a couple of rules I want to ignore, for instance using this. in front of class members. How do I turn off a StyleCop rule. I've looked but can't find how to do it. 回答1: In your StyleCop install, there's a Settings.StyleCop file. You can edit this to turn off rules globally. Drag that file onto the Settings Editor executable in that file to edit it. You can also put copies of the settings file into your projects to override the global settings. If you're using

Best way to integrate StyleCop with TFS CI

北城余情 提交于 2019-11-27 05:23:04
问题 I've been doing research on how to enable source analysis for the project I'm working on and plan to use StyleCop. The setup I have is a TFS Server for source control, using TFS Continuous Integration. I want to enable source analysis for CI builds and daily builds run on the build machine, and not only for those run on developers' machines. Here's an article from the documentation of StyleCop that I read on the subject: http://blog.newagesolution.net/2008/07/how-to-use-stylecop-and-msbuild

Visual Studio Code Analysis vs StyleCop + FxCop

谁都会走 提交于 2019-11-27 05:05:41
问题 I used previously StyleCop + FxCop on my Visual Studio's projects. But now I am testing Visual Studio Code Analysis tool, which is easier to integrate into MSBuild, and I have found that this tools analyses some of the rules of both FxCop and StyleCop. Is this tool a full replacement for both FxCop and StyleCop or does it just implement some of their rules? 回答1: Visual Studio includes FxCop + more. From the developer blog of FxCop: Sorry about my ignorance, but I assume FxCop is completely

How to suppress a StyleCop warning?

孤街醉人 提交于 2019-11-27 01:23:17
I'm using StyleCop and want to suppress some warning which does not suit my style. I prefer to have solution for 1) in-line code suppressing 2) global setting suppressing I've searched the internet but still not sure how to do the suppressing. For method 1), They said to add the lines: [assembly: SuppressMessage("Microsoft.Design", "SA1202:All private methods must be placed after all public methods", Scope = "namespace", Target = "Consus.Client.ClientVaultModule.Services.OnlineDetection")] But they do not say where and which namespace to be used. For method 2), they said to use GlobalSuppress

Why does StyleCop recommend prefixing method or property calls with “this”?

你。 提交于 2019-11-26 18:42:59
I have been trying to follow StyleCop's guidelines on a project, to see if the resulting code was better in the end. Most rules are reasonable or a matter of opinion on coding standard, but there is one rule which puzzles me, because I haven't seen anyone else recommend it, and because I don't see a clear benefit to it: SA1101: The call to {method or property name} must begin with the 'this.' prefix to indicate that the item is a member of the class. On the downside, the code is clearly more verbose that way, so what are the benefits of following that rule? Does anyone here follow that rule?

How to suppress a StyleCop warning?

旧街凉风 提交于 2019-11-26 08:21:48
问题 I\'m using StyleCop and want to suppress some warning which does not suit my style. I prefer to have solution for 1) in-line code suppressing 2) global setting suppressing I\'ve searched the internet but still not sure how to do the suppressing. For method 1), They said to add the lines: [assembly: SuppressMessage(\"Microsoft.Design\", \"SA1202:All private methods must be placed after all public methods\", Scope = \"namespace\", Target = \"Consus.Client.ClientVaultModule.Services