ssl

Using public SSL for dynamic domains to map on single cloudfront

限于喜欢 提交于 2020-04-30 09:27:06
问题 I am creating a portal where I am letting my customers map their domains or sub-domains to my CloudFront distribution. So, this way customer comes in and enter a domain name "domainname.com" or "test.domainname.com", and this domain will hit to my CloudFront distribution. I know that we cannot add multiple certificates in CloudFront, but let me explain my requirements. We have a site builder. The site builder application is hosted on my server which is on my datacenter which is NOT on Amazon

How to install GoDaddy SSL certificates in Tomcat without CSR?

眉间皱痕 提交于 2020-04-30 08:37:07
问题 One of our clients purchased wild card SSL certificates (*.example.com) from GoDaddy and he simply downloaded without giving CSR data. We have 3 files in that zip file. Those are fce4f111a61ea3f4.crt , gd_bundle-g2-g1.crt and gdig2.crt.pem . I searched so many articles regarding this but everyone is saying first take the CSR data from your server and past it in the GoDaddy for getting SSL certificates. In my case we didn't provide CSR data to GoDaddy, which means I don't have the keystore

AWS Certificate Manager - Do regions matter?

╄→гoц情女王★ 提交于 2020-04-29 12:56:13
问题 I already have a certificate from AWS Certificate Manager (ACM) when only the 1 region was available (think the US-West-1 region?) and currently being used with Cloudfront to host a website for the Australian market. Now that ACM is available in more regions, would using a certificate created from the Sydney region have any improvements in performance? 回答1: ACM now supports multiple regions, but that doesn't have any implications for certificates for use with CloudFront. To use an ACM

“Authentication failed because the remote party has closed the transport stream” when transferring to/from FTP server over TLS/SSL using FluentFTP

假装没事ソ 提交于 2020-04-27 04:49:43
问题 I have used FluentFTP lib im my project to work with FTP via TLS, but some trouble here. This code working fine: using (var conn = new FtpClient("adress", "user", "password")) { conn.EncryptionMode = FtpEncryptionMode.Explicit; conn.ValidateAnyCertificate = true; conn.Connect(); conn.CreateDirectory("/test/path/that/should/be/created", true); } And directory were created. But in other examples it not working good. First exmple (logfile - https://pastebin.com/jNyZ3fmD): public static void

“Authentication failed because the remote party has closed the transport stream” when transferring to/from FTP server over TLS/SSL using FluentFTP

旧街凉风 提交于 2020-04-27 04:48:35
问题 I have used FluentFTP lib im my project to work with FTP via TLS, but some trouble here. This code working fine: using (var conn = new FtpClient("adress", "user", "password")) { conn.EncryptionMode = FtpEncryptionMode.Explicit; conn.ValidateAnyCertificate = true; conn.Connect(); conn.CreateDirectory("/test/path/that/should/be/created", true); } And directory were created. But in other examples it not working good. First exmple (logfile - https://pastebin.com/jNyZ3fmD): public static void

“Authentication failed because the remote party has closed the transport stream” when transferring to/from FTP server over TLS/SSL using FluentFTP

孤人 提交于 2020-04-27 04:48:18
问题 I have used FluentFTP lib im my project to work with FTP via TLS, but some trouble here. This code working fine: using (var conn = new FtpClient("adress", "user", "password")) { conn.EncryptionMode = FtpEncryptionMode.Explicit; conn.ValidateAnyCertificate = true; conn.Connect(); conn.CreateDirectory("/test/path/that/should/be/created", true); } And directory were created. But in other examples it not working good. First exmple (logfile - https://pastebin.com/jNyZ3fmD): public static void

SSL/TLS协议运行机制的概述

笑着哭i 提交于 2020-04-26 19:02:16
互联网的通信安全,建立在SSL/TLS协议之上。 本文简要介绍SSL/TLS协议的运行机制。文章的重点是设计思想和运行过程,不涉及具体的实现细节。如果想了解这方面的内容,请参阅 RFC文档 。 一、作用 不使用SSL/TLS的HTTP通信,就是不加密的通信。所有信息明文传播,带来了三大风险。 (1) 窃听风险(eavesdropping):第三方可以获知通信内容。 (2) 篡改风险(tampering):第三方可以修改通信内容。 (3) 冒充风险(pretending):第三方可以冒充他人身份参与通信。 SSL/TLS协议是为了解决这三大风险而设计的,希望达到: (1) 所有信息都是加密传播,第三方无法窃听。 (2) 具有校验机制,一旦被篡改,通信双方会立刻发现。 (3) 配备身份证书,防止身份被冒充。 互联网是开放环境,通信双方都是未知身份,这为协议的设计带来了很大的难度。而且,协议还必须能够经受所有匪夷所思的攻击,这使得SSL/TLS协议变得异常复杂。 二、历史 互联网加密通信协议的历史,几乎与互联网一样长。 1994年,NetScape公司设计了SSL协议(Secure Sockets Layer)的1.0版,但是未发布。 1995年,NetScape公司发布SSL 2.0版,很快发现有严重漏洞。 1996年,SSL 3.0版问世,得到大规模应用。 1999年

Unable to import App Service Certificate after Subscription transfer

混江龙づ霸主 提交于 2020-04-18 03:49:14
问题 I recently transferred an Azure Subscription to a new account owner in a new directory. After doing so, I am no longer able to import an App Service Certificate into my App Service, and am thus unable to create any TSL/SSL bindings . When I click Import App Service Certificate , the certificate correctly shows up; when I click on the certificate it correctly displays Validated the App Service Certificate ; but when I click OK , I get the following error: Failed to add App Service certificate

Node.js TLS connections without hostname verification

白昼怎懂夜的黑 提交于 2020-04-17 22:10:52
问题 I'm playing with a swarm of "nodes" connecting to each other, and all I really care for is that they are connected securely to each other and are all authenticated. For this I figured the TLS module would be a good fit. I created a CA and signed a bunch of certificates, one for each node. I then hit the issue that certificates are now validated against the host from which the node connects. Is it possible somehow to disable or work around the Common Name validation? Is there something

Node.js TLS connections without hostname verification

生来就可爱ヽ(ⅴ<●) 提交于 2020-04-17 22:08:55
问题 I'm playing with a swarm of "nodes" connecting to each other, and all I really care for is that they are connected securely to each other and are all authenticated. For this I figured the TLS module would be a good fit. I created a CA and signed a bunch of certificates, one for each node. I then hit the issue that certificates are now validated against the host from which the node connects. Is it possible somehow to disable or work around the Common Name validation? Is there something