spock

Im working on a Spring Boot java service that contains a Camel Processor class as follows: public class MyProc implements Processor { @Autowired private LogService logService; public void process(Exchange e) { // exchange object processing logService.update(e) } } And I have the following Spock test: class MyProcTest extends Specification { @Shared def logService = Mock(LogService) @Shared def proc = new MyProc() def ctx = new DefaultCamelContext() def exch = new DefaultExchange(ctx) void setupSpec() { proc.logService = logService } def "log is updated when valid exchange is processed"() {

I have checked this link: https://gist.github.com/ysb33r/5825457 It seems like that it can be run like this: groovyc *.groovy java -cp ~/.grapes/org.spockframework/spock-core/jars/spock-core-0.7-groovy-2.0.jar:$GROOVY_HOME/embeddable/groovy-all-2.1.4.jar:$GROOVY_HOME/lib/junit-4.11.jar:$GROOVY_HOME/lib/hamcrest-core-1.3.jar:.org.junit.runner.JUnitCore ExampleSpec And I have added all third part jars to CLASSPATH,so all imports from these libs found.But all my own classes can't be found,and error message like this: org.codehaus.groovy.control.MultipleCompilationErrorsException: startup failed:

I'm currently working on some integration (or functional, I'm not really a QA but back-end dev, so I might be sloppy with terms) REST tests for our project, we are using Grails 3.0.9, Spock Framework 1.0-Groovy-2.4 and PostgreSQL DB for testing. Also we have separate DB for testing purposes, it is still crucial that changes are rolled back after each test. I have looked through Grails testing doc and was trying to use @Rollback annotation as described in examples - and it is just not working, changes are still committed to DB. As it is work project, I can't provide some real code snippets,

My env configs: Java 1.7u51, Grails 2.3.7 I'm trying to assert response.text in Controller Test but it always brings "". What's happening? This is my UserController class UserController { def index() { flash.errors = "$params.secret" render view: "index", model: [model: params.toModel, text: params.username] } } This is /user/index.gsp file ${text} This is my Specification @TestFor(UserController) class UserControllerSpec extends Specification { def setup() { } def cleanup() { } void "test something"() { given: params.username = "USERNAME" params.password = "SECRET" params.toModel = "Model"

When using a Spock test, i have hardcoded some properties hardcoded into the spock test. The example is a JDBC url. I tried the @Value annotation together with a propertie file, but this seems not to work as my test has no stereotype. Are there any other solutions to inject property values? @ContextConfiguration(locations = "classpath*:applicationContext-test.xml") class RepositoryTest extends Specification { @Shared sql = Sql.newInstance("jdbc:sqlserver:// - room - for - properties") } @Shared properties cannot be injected, but something like this should work (with Spring 3): @Value("#

I am using spock for may application testing and using Grails 2.4.4. I have done domain, controller, and service unit testing. But in controller sections I am stuck with the role wise access. For authentication I am using Spring Security Core Plugin. Below is my sample code. @Secured(["IS_AUTHENTICATED_FULLY"]) def index(Integer max) { } @Secured(["ROLE_A","ROLE_B"]) def create() { respond new DomainName(params) } @Transactional @Secured(["ROLE_A","ROLE_B"]) def save(DomainName DomainNameInstance) { } How do I test that only the user with ROLE_A and ROLE_B can create and save and other cannot?

Is there a way to obtain specifications (filtering the code) from my Spock tests printed in a file? For example, for the following spec: class CarSpec extends IntegrationSpec { def 'it should not retrieve deleted cars'() { given: 'a car' def car = new Car(uniqueName: 'carName') car.save() when: 'I delete the car' car.delete() then: 'it shouldn't find me the car on the DB' Car.find { uniqueName == 'carName' } == null } } should print something like: CarSpec it should not retrieve deleted cars given a car when I delete the car then it shouldn't find me the car on the DB You could use one of the