spf

Building a enewsletter sending system / avoiding spam

我的未来我决定 提交于 2019-12-03 21:17:22
Firstly, I AM NOT A SPAMMER :) I am a legitimate developer, working for a company who is currently developing an enewsletter sending system for our clients. Now, we sent out a campaign for one of our clients to 80k solicited emails, and we got a huge amount blocked due to spam, even though our client has used ymlp.com to send similar campaigns to the same mailing list in the past with no problems. I have stumbled across a few nuggets of information such as: How to send 100,000 emails weekly? http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/2010/04/so-youd-like-to-send-some-email-through-code.html So I have

How to know if the SPF config is working (Amazon SES/Route53)?

喜夏-厌秋 提交于 2019-12-03 13:18:08
I'm using Amazon SES and Route53 and confused how I specify the TXT value to include the proper SPF config. Amazon gave me a SES TXT name/value pair which looks something like this: Name: "_amazonses.xxx.com" Value: "bInxJfnRbxxxxx9uFXgmxxxxxQHd08UxxxxxxsG+k=" I plugged this into my Route53 Record Set (same as "Zone file" on Godaddy). Sure enough after adding my SMTP credentials to my app and having Amazon verify my account ("grant production access"), it works and I can send email from my site to a variety of accounts (Gmail, Yahoo, Hotmail, my .edu university account). I know nothing about

How to properly set up DNS SPF records?

僤鯓⒐⒋嵵緔 提交于 2019-12-03 04:50:02
问题 I'm sending weekly emails to subscribers and it turns out that messages are frequently going to the spam folder for users. I'm utilizing Amazon SES to send these messages and have added an SPF record according to their instructions: http://docs.amazonwebservices.com/ses/latest/DeveloperGuide/SPFSenderIDDKIM.html?r=3917 In querying the SPF records for my domain I get the following back from http://www.kitterman.com/spf/validate.html: SPF record lookup and validation for: mydomain.tld SPF

What is the correct SPF record for using both Amazon SES and Google Apps

浪子不回头ぞ 提交于 2019-12-02 23:08:21
What would be the correct SPF record to use for both Amazon SES and Google Apps together: Google Apps says they want you to have the tilde "~" in it: http://support.google.com/a/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=178723 , but most other examples have a dash "-" instead. Amazon wants: "v=spf1 include:amazonses.com -all" Google wants: "v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all" We currently have this, combining both together: TXT "v=spf1 include:amazonses.com include:_spf.google.com ~all" SPF "v=spf1 include:amazonses.com include:_spf.google.com ~all" 1) Is this the correct SPF record? 2) Are we missing

How to properly set up DNS SPF records?

余生长醉 提交于 2019-12-02 19:09:45
I'm sending weekly emails to subscribers and it turns out that messages are frequently going to the spam folder for users. I'm utilizing Amazon SES to send these messages and have added an SPF record according to their instructions: http://docs.amazonwebservices.com/ses/latest/DeveloperGuide/SPFSenderIDDKIM.html?r=3917 In querying the SPF records for my domain I get the following back from http://www.kitterman.com/spf/validate.html : SPF record lookup and validation for: mydomain.tld SPF records are primarily published in DNS as TXT records. The TXT records found for your domain are: SPF

My E-Mails Always Go To Spam Folder [closed]

旧时模样 提交于 2019-12-01 13:17:27
In my server i send mails by PHP but my mails always go to spam folders. I did spf record thing but it didn't matter. Also i use google apps service with this domain. Please Help Mail Original: Delivered-To: mektup@gmail.com Received: by 10.42.178.133 with SMTP id bm5cs95762icb; Fri, 31 Dec 2010 19:49:46 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.223.112.1 with SMTP id u1mr875459fap.109.1293853785941; Fri, 31 Dec 2010 19:49:45 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: <apache@loft1397.serverloft.eu> Received: from loft1397.serverloft.eu (loft1397.serverloft.eu [82.25.120.6]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 17si15455863fau.0

SPF record for amazon ec2

喜夏-厌秋 提交于 2019-12-01 08:49:49
From where do I get the correct syntax to create a proper SPF record for EC2 amazon server? I understand how to create a dns entry but I have no idea what to put in place for the SPF record. This is very easy to do: Provision an Elastic IP for your server Setup an "A" record for the server which will be sending mail with your favorite registrar- a good practice to follow is to include "svr" somewhere in the hostname, as in, app-svr-01.youdomain.com Click here to contact amazon and ask for a reverse dns record for the IP add the following somewhere in your SPF record and you should be good to

DMARC -spf and DKIM record queries

泄露秘密 提交于 2019-11-30 05:32:26
问题 I have a scenario with 3rd party vendors… Our company has a lot of 3rd party mail services. I have set up the dmarc with p – none and SPF records were updated with known sending servers. Could you please clarify a statement which I read in Dmarc.org site about making 3rd party vendors Dmarc compliant. 1. Either add the 3rd party sending servers to our spf records 2. Or share your DKIM private key to them My question is, SPF checks for envelope from address so when the vendor sends mails on

golang的全局声明的生命周期

放肆的年华 提交于 2019-11-29 10:19:08
场景: 当我们要进行redis操作或者其他中间件操作的时候,为了少发起服务端的连接,我们会在main函数外先建立连接,以减少服务端的连接次数 真相: 事实上,很多中间件的连接只是一个语法声明,其实并没有进行真正的连接,比如下面的代码 package main import ( "fmt" "github.com/garyburd/redigo/redis" "github.com/spf13/cast" "math/rand" "time" ) var ( rds, errxx = redis.Dial("tcp", "1.1.1.1:3333") ) func Do(i int) { fmt.Println("开始进行redis操作...") act, err := rds.Do("SET", "name" + cast.ToString(i), i) fmt.Println(act, "--------", err) } func main() { ticker := time.NewTicker(3 * time.Second) defer ticker.Stop() for { select { case <-ticker.C: Do(rand.Intn(1000)) } } } 事实上每一个操作redis的时候,都会对redis重新发起一次连接,并没有起到减少连接的作用

Too many DNS lookups in an SPF record

谁说我不能喝 提交于 2019-11-28 16:22:17
My website needs to send out emails with Google Apps, SendGrid and MailChimp services. Google Apps is used to receive and read incoming email to my domain. I need to set the SPF record for my domain. The following is syntactically correct (not sure about A and MX tokens): "v=spf1 a mx include: _spf.google.com include: servers.mcsv.net include: sendgrid.net ~all" But if I test it with http://www.kitterman.com/getspf2.py I get PermError SPF Permanent Error: Too many DNS lookups Similar problem as http://www.onlineaspect.com/2009/03/20/too-many-dns-lookups-in-an-spf-record/ How can I optimize