specifications

I would like to detect whether qmake is currently building using MingW (win32-gcc) or Visual Studio (win32-msvc200X). At the moment I am using the following construct: windows{ contains(QMAKE_CC, gcc){ # MingW } contains(QMAKE_CC, cl){ # Visual Studio } } This does not seem particularly robust. Is there a better way? Tuomas Probably not anymore robust, but different: windows { *-g++* { # MinGW } *-msvc* { # MSVC } } 来源： https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1741993/qmake-test-for-current-spec

Even the new HTML5 tags aren't enough to describe structures without falling back to div s. What's stopping me from changing: <div class="post"> <div class="userinfo"> <span class="name">Casey</span> <img class="avatar" src="..." /> </div> <div class="body"> <p>blah blah blah</p> <p>blah blah blah</p> <p>blah blah blah</p> </div> </div> into something like: <post> <userinfo> <name>Casey</name> <img class="avatar" src="..." /> </userinfo> <pbody> <p>blah blah blah</p> <p>blah blah blah</p> <p>blah blah blah</p> </pbody> </post> To me, the second example is a lot cleaner. Is there anything (i.e.

I am implementation the logic from link: Spring Data - Multi-column searches where I am looking to search by FirstName . As per link: https://docs.spring.io/spring-data/jpa/docs/current/api/org/springframework/data/jpa/domain/Specifications.html EmployeeSpecification.java public class EmployeeSpecification { public static Specification<Employee> textInAllColumns(String text) { if (!text.contains("%")) { text = "%" + text + "%"; } final String finalText = text; return new Specification<Employee>() { @Override public Predicate toPredicate(Root<Employee> root, CriteriaQuery<Employee> cq,

I'm kinda a new to writing spec files and building RPM's. Currently I have one RPM that is supposed to deploy some files in 1 of 2 possible directories that will vary with the OS. How can I, within the %files section, verify them? I can't use variable...I can't verify both paths because one will for sure fail...I tried to define a macro earlier in the %install section but it will be defined just once and won't be redefined on every RPM installation... what can I do here? Thanks The %files section can have variables in it, but usually this would be something like your path that is defined so

This is a typescript interface: interface A { l: { x: string; y:number } } But this (similar thing) produces an error: interface A { l: { x: string, y:number } } // => Error: ';' expected. On p.37 of the spec: http://www.typescriptlang.org/Content/TypeScript%20Language%20Specification.pdf I see that indeed it is specified that a ; should appear there, but coming from JavaScript the semicolon in the middle of the object-literal-ish thing looks wrong. Was this decision made to avoid ambiguity in the parser, or for some other reason? As of TypeScript 1.6 or so, you can now use either , or ; as a