soa

DNS & bind从基础到深入

末鹿安然 提交于 2019-12-21 15:33:47
本链接转载自: https://www.cnblogs.com/f-ck-need-u/p/7367503.html 仅供自学使用。 DNS是Domain name system的简称,有些地方也称为Domain name server,这东西是一个很大的话题。如果不是要配置DNS服务,只需要理解DNS的解析流程和DNS有关的基本知识即可。如果要配置DNS服务,则可以看完全文。 推荐阅读书籍:《DNS & bind》,第四版有中文版,第五版目前只有英文版。 7.1 DNS必懂基础 DNS主要是用于将域名解析为IP地址的协议,有时候也用于将IP地址反向解析成域名,所以DNS可以实现双向解析。 DNS可以使用TCP和UDP的53端口,基本使用UDP协议的53端口。 7.1.1 域的分类 域是分层管理的,就像中国的行政级别。 最高层的域是根域(root)".",就是一个点,它就像国家主席一样。全球只有13个根域服务器,基本上都在美国,中国一台根域服务器都没有。 根域的下一层就是第二层次的顶级域(TLD)了,那么它就是各省省长了。顶级域一般两种划分方法:按国家划分和按组织性质划分。 ◇ 按国家划分:.cn(中国)、.tw(台湾)、.hk(香港)。基本都是两个字母的。 ◇ 按组织性质划分:.org、.net、.com、.edu、.gov、.cc等。 ◇ 反向域:arpa

Advantages of SCA over Spring?

六眼飞鱼酱① 提交于 2019-12-21 05:21:14
问题 I have experience developing java web applications with Spring, but not so much with the world of SOA. I was reading about SCA- SCA4J - http://www.service-conduit.org/user-guide.pdf - and alot of this seems very similar to Spring. I was trying to learn about what situations SCA would be useful, but still dont understand what features / benefits SCA offers over using Spring standalone. I found this old blog post - http://rajith.2rlabs.com/2007/08/05/sca-vs-spring-a-reply-to-dans-post/ - but

Erlang/OTP architecture: RESTful protocol for SOAish services

痴心易碎 提交于 2019-12-21 01:22:33
问题 Let us imagine we have an orders processing system for a pizza shop to design and build. The requirements are: R1. The system should be client- and use-case-agnostic, which means that the system can be accessed by a client which was not taken into account during the initial design. For example, if the pizza shop decides that many of its customers use the Samsung Bada smartphones later, writing a client for Bada OS will not require rewriting the system's API and the system itself; or for

Erlang/OTP architecture: RESTful protocol for SOAish services

左心房为你撑大大i 提交于 2019-12-21 01:22:16
问题 Let us imagine we have an orders processing system for a pizza shop to design and build. The requirements are: R1. The system should be client- and use-case-agnostic, which means that the system can be accessed by a client which was not taken into account during the initial design. For example, if the pizza shop decides that many of its customers use the Samsung Bada smartphones later, writing a client for Bada OS will not require rewriting the system's API and the system itself; or for

SOA vs Client-Server vs Web Service - what is the difference? [closed]

自闭症网瘾萝莉.ら 提交于 2019-12-20 10:06:06
问题 Closed . This question needs to be more focused. It is not currently accepting answers. Want to improve this question? Update the question so it focuses on one problem only by editing this post. Closed 5 years ago . After reading some literature on the topics of SOA, Web-Services and Client-Server architectute. I really confused about these terms because can't see the real difference between them. Can someone explain what the actual difference between SOA and Client-Server is? Can I use

Request/Response pattern in SOA implementation

自闭症网瘾萝莉.ら 提交于 2019-12-20 09:05:44
问题 In some enterprise-like project (.NET, WCF) i saw that all service contracts accept a single Request parameter and always return Response : [DataContract] public class CustomerRequest : RequestBase { [DataMember] public long Id { get; set; } } [DataContract] public class CustomerResponse : ResponseBase { [DataMember] public CustomerInfo Customer { get; set; } } where RequestBase/ResponseBase contain common stuff like ErrorCode, Context, etc. Bodies of both service methods and proxies are

微服务与SOA的异同

拟墨画扇 提交于 2019-12-20 05:52:35
什么是微服务 微服务是一种软件架构风格,是以开发一组小型服务的方式来开发一个独立的应用系统。其中每个小型服务都运行在自己的进程中,并经常采用HTTP资源API这样轻量的机制来相互通信。这些服务围绕业务功能进行构建,并能通过全自动的部署机制进行独立部署。这些微服务可以使用不同的语言来编写,并且可以使用不同的数据存储技术。对这些微服务我们仅作最低限度的集中管理。 SOA(service oriented architecture)也是一种软件架构风格,其中应用程序的不同组件通过网络上的通信协议向其他组件提供服务。通信可以涉及简单的数据传递,也可以涉及两个或多个协调彼此之间连接服务的服务。 粗粗一看,微服务和SOA看起来非常相似。主要区别在于范围。简而言之,面向服务的体系结构(SOA)具有企业范围,而微服务体系结构具有应用程序范围。微服务中的服务组件通常只有一个目的,并且确实很好地完成这一任务。另一方面,在SOA中,服务通常包含更多的业务功能,并且通常将它们实现为完整的子系统。 微服务,在某种程度上,是SOA演进的下一步。在提出微服务这个通用名称之前,有人将其称为“微型Web服务”或“细粒度SOA”。 在SOA中,它使用企业服务总线(ESB)进行通信,服务与服务之间通过总线进行消息传递。ESB可能会成为影响整个系统的单点故障。由于每个服务都通过ESB进行通信,因此如果其中一项服务变慢

Fast concurrent checking of SOA DNS records for .co.za domains

北战南征 提交于 2019-12-20 03:23:51
问题 I want to implement bulk availability checking of .co.za domain names as accurately as possible by checking for the existence of SOA or MX records using C# ASP.NET. I am looking for a solution that can check for the relevant DNS records in a way that properly utilises threading to check at least 10 domains at a time. "Why don't you just use an API?" The only truly accurate way of checking the availibility of a .co.za domain is to use http://co.za/whois.shtml, but the archaic WHOIS service

“Error Fetching http body” with php SoapClient

自闭症网瘾萝莉.ら 提交于 2019-12-20 01:41:21
问题 I have some trouble submitting user data to a server by using Soap. All i get is: Error Fetching http body, No Content-Length, connection closed or chunked data Am i doing something wrong? $client = new SoapClient(APPPATH.'my.wsdl',array( 'login' => 'user', 'password' => 'pass', 'location' => 'http://gimmeyadata.com/crm/regserv?wsdl', 'trace' => true, ) ); $result = $client->register(array( 'Email' => 'me@mail.com', 'Gender' => 'm', 'First name' => 'Oliver', 'Last name' => 'Liermann',

“Error Fetching http body” with php SoapClient

*爱你&永不变心* 提交于 2019-12-20 01:41:11
问题 I have some trouble submitting user data to a server by using Soap. All i get is: Error Fetching http body, No Content-Length, connection closed or chunked data Am i doing something wrong? $client = new SoapClient(APPPATH.'my.wsdl',array( 'login' => 'user', 'password' => 'pass', 'location' => 'http://gimmeyadata.com/crm/regserv?wsdl', 'trace' => true, ) ); $result = $client->register(array( 'Email' => 'me@mail.com', 'Gender' => 'm', 'First name' => 'Oliver', 'Last name' => 'Liermann',