shared-libraries

问题 Is there a utility that can take ALL the SO's that an Elf needs turn them into static then converts the Elf to be SO's free? 回答1: Here are some projects you might find useful: Statifier (basically does what you want) ERESI (might do what you want, also allows for analysis of ELF targets) NOTE: I've not used either application myself. 回答2: Statifier is an option. Another option is Ermine. While Ermine is commercial it behaves better than statifier on systems with memory randomization. 回答3: I

问题 I want to set under Mac OSX the runtime path of an executable (for the linker) at compile time, such that shared libraries at non-standard locations are found by the dynamic linker at program start. Under Linux this is possible with -Xlinker -rpath -Xlinker /path/to (or using -Wl,-rpath,/path/to ) and under Solaris you can add -R/path/to to the compiler command line. I found some information that Mac OS X gcc has -rpath support since 10.5, i.e. since ~ 2008. I tried to get it working with a

问题 I have a library I am building. All of my objects compile and link successively when I run either one of: ar rcs lib/libryftts.a $^ gcc -shared $^ -o lib/libryftts.so in my Makefile. I also am able to successfully install them into /usr/local/lib When I test the file with nm, all the functions are there. My problem is that when I run gcc testing/test.c -lryftts -o test && file ./test or gcc testing/test.c lib/libryftts.a -o test && file ./test it says: test: ELF 64-bit LSB shared object

问题 We develop some project in plain C (C99). But, we have one library as source codes (math library) in C++ . We need this library so I would like to ask, what is the most elegant way to integrate this source codes? Ratio between sizes of C and C++ is 20:1 so moving to C++ is not the option. Should we use static library? DLL? (It's all on Windows). 回答1: EDIT: Based on discussion in the comment, I should point out that separating things into a C-compatible struct duck and a derived class Duck is

问题 Some time ago I had asked whether adding fields to a struct of a shared library would require a major or a minor change in the version string according to semantic versioning. The few participants where inclined to suggest a major change. Months have passed and I have not added any fields to my struct yet. But now it might be the right time for doing it. However in the meanwhile I have also been thinking about how this could break binary compatibility with programs compiled with previous

问题 As ugly as win32 Microsoft compiler is by using the __declspec macro, it does have the advantage of being explicit about what you want to export or not. Moving the same code onto a Linux gnu/gcc system now means all classes are exported!(?) Is this really true? Is there a way to NOT export a class within a shared library under gcc? #ifndef WIN32 #define __IMPEXP__ #else #undef __IMPEXP__ #ifdef __BUILDING_PULSETRACKER__ #define __IMPEXP__ __declspec(dllexport) #else #define __IMPEXP__ _

问题 I understand pros and cons of static and dynamic linking. But what is the benefit of Import Library? 回答1: As it is stated in this answer import library (a.k.a. stub library) is useful when one wants to link executable dynamically but do not want to mess with LoadLibrary and GetProcAddress functions. 来源： https://stackoverflow.com/questions/39401403/import-library-benefit

问题 My situation is I have a library that doesn't have a "lib" prefix. I'd like to link against it, and I can't recompile it (it's actually a Python module). Now, if you use the '-l' flag with GCC or clang, then the lib prefix is automatically added and the library is not found. For GCC, I can use '-l:mylib.so' to get it to link against an arbitrary file. However, this doesn't work for clang. Is it possible to get clang to link against a particular library without the 'lib' prefix? 回答1: This

问题 I'm having troubles trying to get my external Java project so I can use Android classes on it as well. The library is already integrated on the Android project. For instance: I have several model classes on it that I would want to implement Parcelable so they can be seriallized accordingly, but none of the Android classes are available on them. Clarification I only did this in order to try to solve the issue So far I've only tried: Changing and matching the external library's package: Package

问题 I'm using Code::Blocks for a project. I have not used an IDE on Linux in years, so I'm a bit out of touch with Linux IDEs. I'm working with an OpenSSL project that uses FIPS validated library. I duplicated the GCC compiler toolchain and modified it to use OpenSSL's fipsld (and set it as default). When the project's code executes under Code::Blocks via F8 , FIPS_mode_set fails with error 252104805 (0xF06D065). 0xF06D065 is: $ openssl errstr 0xF06D065 error:0F06D065:common libcrypto routines