server.transfer

How to create a server control on another ASPX file

笑着哭i 提交于 2020-01-15 10:27:27
问题 I am developing a C#/SQL ASP.NET web application in VS 2008. Currently, I am transferring control from one ASPX file to another: if (uploadFile.PostedFile.ContentLength > 0) { inputfile = System.IO.File.ReadAllText(path); Context.Items["Message"] = inputfile; //Page1 Server.Transfer("DataMatch.aspx"); //Page1 } However, it fails on this Server.Transfer line after inserting runat="server" in the DataMatch.aspx file to the Table element like so: <table width="50%" id="tMain" runat="server"> But

Server.Transfer Vs. Response.Redirect

梦想的初衷 提交于 2019-12-16 20:01:42
问题 What is difference between Server.Transfer and Response.Redirect ? What are advantages and disadvantages of each? When is one appropriate over the other? When is one not appropriate? 回答1: Response.Redirect simply sends a message (HTTP 302) down to the browser. Server.Transfer happens without the browser knowing anything, the browser request a page, but the server returns the content of another. 回答2: Response.Redirect() will send you to a new page, update the address bar and add it to the

Which one is better Server.Transfer and Response.Redirect

試著忘記壹切 提交于 2019-12-12 10:02:03
问题 Which one is better, Server.Transfer or Response.Redirect ? I am looking for some explanation for this. 回答1: They have different functions. Definition of better depends on what you are trying to do. Response.Redirect tells the client to visit a new address, which can be anywhere. Server.Transfer forwards the request (optionally preserving the query string) to another page on the same server. If your criterion is cutting unnecessary overhead given that the new page is on the same server,

ASP.NET VB.NET Remote Login Portal Setup

我们两清 提交于 2019-12-12 06:06:11
问题 Technology ASP.NET, VB.NET 2.0 (soon to be 4.0) Overview I'm writing a Login / Authentication Portal, so that a web application can use it to login a user, and then they can use the application using their credentials. The login portal will be a separate application, and initially only available via an extranet as well as intranet for certain applications; but future apps will need to authenticate via the web (happy to implement as a separate instance). I basically want other individual

HttpContext.Current.Items cleared via responseMode=“ExecuteURL”?

眉间皱痕 提交于 2019-12-10 04:52:49
问题 I avoid the default ASP.NET approach of redirecting on errors (as many people do). Clean AJAX code and SEO are among the reasons. However, I'm using the following method to do it, and it seems that I may lose HttpContext.Current.Items in the transfer? <httpErrors errorMode="Custom" existingResponse="Replace"> <remove statusCode="401" /> <remove statusCode="403" /> <remove statusCode="404" /> <remove statusCode="500" /> <error statusCode="401" responseMode="ExecuteURL" path="/Account/SignIn" /

Why we cant use Server.Transfer() to redirect on another server

元气小坏坏 提交于 2019-12-09 13:38:13
问题 I know that Server.Transfer() should be used to redirect to another ".aspx" page on the same server. But what is the reason behind why should I not use this method to redirect to aspx page on another server or html page? Your answers are really appriciated. 回答1: Server.Transfer can only happen for single HttpContext. Each virtual directory or app has its own HttpContext object and they know not that they co-exists! so you cannot do that. 回答2: Firstly, transferring to another page using Server

Error: Unable to evaluate expression because the code is optimized

柔情痞子 提交于 2019-12-08 15:16:54
问题 I am getting an error in my asp.net app that reads "Unable to evaluate expression because the code is optimized or a native frame is on top of the call stack." protected void btnCustomerProfile_Click(object sender, EventArgs e) { try { Server.Transfer("CustomerProfile.aspx"); } catch (Exception ex) { Response.Write(ex.ToString()); } finally { } } After searching SO, I see most of the similar posts involve response.redirect. My code is using server.transfer and my application is also using

Is there any workaround for the UpdatePanel + Server.Transfer problem?

假装没事ソ 提交于 2019-12-08 01:37:00
问题 I'm trying to use an UpdatePanel in my ASP.NET application. Unfortunately, it seems that I can't do this if I am using Server.Transfer() in my application. Modifying that component of the application is not possible - the architecture makes extensive use of Server.Transfer() - in essence, every page request goes through this method. Does any workaround exist for this issue exist? Having to do full-page postbacks is so unfashionable these days... 回答1: I've got it! Thank Og for strange foreign

asp.net on session timeout redirect to home page

别等时光非礼了梦想. 提交于 2019-12-06 13:29:41
问题 i have web app and on session timeout and user interaction on the page, this needs to redirect to home/landing page solutions found on the net 1) Session check in page_load of all the aspx pages of the application. 2) code in session start of global.asax public void Session_Start { Response.Redirect("home.aspx"); // or Server.Transfer("home.aspx"); } I am going for 2nd option,let me know 1) whether i am in right way or any better solutions for this? 2) in the second option whether to use

Is there any workaround for the UpdatePanel + Server.Transfer problem?

孤人 提交于 2019-12-06 12:43:32
I'm trying to use an UpdatePanel in my ASP.NET application. Unfortunately, it seems that I can't do this if I am using Server.Transfer() in my application . Modifying that component of the application is not possible - the architecture makes extensive use of Server.Transfer() - in essence, every page request goes through this method. Does any workaround exist for this issue exist? Having to do full-page postbacks is so unfashionable these days... I've got it! Thank Og for strange foreign language blogs :) To fix it, I can simply tell the ASP.NET AJAX client-side framework to direct the partial