seo

Schema.org setup for related products?

╄→尐↘猪︶ㄣ 提交于 2019-12-04 14:37:19
I would like to setup Schema.org markup for related products. I have tried this code but I have doubt in my mind: itemprop="isRelatedTo" itemscope itemtype="http://schema.org/Product" My product page is https://www.amigotrekking.com/everest-base-camp-trek.html If it’s a "functionally similar" product, use the isSimilarTo property. If it’s a "consumable" for another product, use the isConsumableFor property. If it’s an "accessory or spare part" for another product, use the isAccessoryOrSparePartFor property. If it’s a "somehow related" product, use the isRelatedTo property. So for a related

xpath in =importXML() for extracting meta descriptions

我怕爱的太早我们不能终老 提交于 2019-12-04 14:36:46
I'm trying to use Xpath to pull in the meta descriptions from web pages, using Google Sheets. I have this working to pull in the titles: =importXml(www.example.com; "//title") Here are two sources of my learning: http://seogadget.co.uk/playing-around-with-importxml-in-google-spreadsheets/ http://docs.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=75507 I have read many other posts on this site, and this seems to be the similar idea of what I want: "/html/head/meta[@name='description']/@content" "/*/head/meta[@name='description']/@content" "//head/meta[@name=\"description\"]/@content" None of

Does the user agent string have to be exactly as it appears in my server logs?

天大地大妈咪最大 提交于 2019-12-04 13:39:41
When using a Robots.txt file, does the user agent string have to be exactly as it appears in my server logs? For example when trying to match GoogleBot, can I just use googlebot ? Also, will a partial-match work? For example just using Google ? Yes, the user agent has to be an exact match. From robotstxt.org : "globbing and regular expression are not supported in either the User-agent or Disallow lines" At least for googlebot, the user-agent is non-case-sensitive. Read the 'Order of precedence for user-agents' section: https://code.google.com/intl/de/web/controlcrawlindex/docs/robots_txt.html

Is it a good idea to use <a href=“http://name.com” rel=“noindex, nofollow”>name</a> in this situation? [closed]

蓝咒 提交于 2019-12-04 12:59:56
Closed. This question is off-topic. It is not currently accepting answers. Learn more . Want to improve this question? Update the question so it's on-topic for Stack Overflow. Closed 7 years ago . I have a network of about 200 blogs (Wordpress Multisite), and all of them show links to all the other ones on a sidebar on the right hand side (basically 200+ links on the right hand side of every single page). I have it set to rel="nofollow" now, but I was wondering if changing it to rel="noindex, nofollow" would be a good idea? Thank you for any input. nofollow nofollow only means that a bot

SEO blacklisting for cloaking [closed]

风格不统一 提交于 2019-12-04 12:48:30
I am using postbacks to perform paging on a large amount of data. Since I did not have a sitemap for google to read, there will be products that google will never know about due to the fact that google does not push any buttons. I am doing cloaking to spit out all the products with no paging if the user-agent is that of a search engine. There may be some work arounds for situations like this which include hidden buttons to paged urls. What about information you want indexed buy google but you want to charge for the content. Imagine that I have articles that I want users to be able to find in

Short URL or long URL for SEO

好久不见. 提交于 2019-12-04 09:10:38
I am implementing cs-cart for a web site. Which one is better for SEO if possible with a reason or reference. Site sells books stamps cds etc. www.domain.com/book/Java.html (or) www.domain.com/book/programming/Java.html or www.domain.com/Java.html Some says short URLs are good. But isnt it good that stating which category the product it is in. Thanks You can go for both, via canonical URL s. For example, in the <head> of both /Java.html and /book/Java.html: <link rel="canonical" href="/book/programming/Java.html" /> With that, Googlebot (and Yahoo/MS' spiders) will see the current page as a

Validation error: “The itemprop attribute was specified, but the element is not a property of any item”

南楼画角 提交于 2019-12-04 08:56:08
问题 For better SEO I need put some meta on my page like this: <!-- Schema.org markup for Google+ --> <meta itemprop="name" content="The Name or Title Here"> <meta itemprop="description" content="This is the page description"> <meta itemprop="image" content="http://www.example.com/image.jpg"> Here is the source. Then I check this code on Markup Validation Service: <!DOCTYPE html> <html> <head lang="en"> <meta itemprop="name" content="The Name or Title Here"> <meta itemprop="description" content=

Is using a select list for navigation SEO Friendly?

|▌冷眼眸甩不掉的悲伤 提交于 2019-12-04 07:50:54
I really don't like the use of select/option elements for links: But they've found their way into the designers portfolio as an option and try as I might to dissuade them from using them, I know I'm going to lose the battle without the power Google and "it's bad for SEO". I searched all over the net, and can find nothing specific to support or debunk my thoughts. The select list that I write will end up having full accessibility with a back end script to follow the link, but does anyone know for sure if search engines will follow or ignore the URLs? <form action="/redirect-script" method="post

How do you use React.js for SEO?

百般思念 提交于 2019-12-04 07:33:11
问题 Articles on React.js like to point out, that React.js is great for SEO purposes. Unfortunately, I've never read, how you actually do it. Do you simply implement _escaped_fragment_ as in https://developers.google.com/webmasters/ajax-crawling/docs/getting-started and let React render the page on the server, when the url contains _escaped_fragment_ , or is there more to it? Being able not to rely on _escaped_fragment_ would be great, as probably not all potentially crawling sites (e.g. in

Java and SEO URLS

☆樱花仙子☆ 提交于 2019-12-04 07:26:46
I'm building a webapp using spring MVC and am curious as to whether there is any clean way to make SEO urls. For example, instead of http://mysite.com/articles/articleId and the such, have: http://mysite.com/articles/my-article-subject This might be of interest to you: http://tuckey.org/urlrewrite/ If you are familiar with mod_rewrite on Apache servers, this is a similar concept. If you're using the new Spring-MVC annotations, you can use the @RequestMapping and @PathVariable annotations: @RequestMapping("/articles/{subject}") public ModelAndView findArticleBySubject(@PathVariable("subject")