semantics

Finding related words (specifically physical objects) to a specific word

由 依然范特西╮ 提交于 2019-11-27 05:07:42
问题 I am trying to find words (specifically physical objects) related to a single word. For example: Tennis : tennis racket, tennis ball, tennis shoe Snooker : snooker cue, snooker ball, chalk Chess : chessboard, chess piece Bookcase : book I have tried to use WordNet, specifically the meronym semantic relationship; however, this method is not consistent as the results below show: Tennis : serve, volley, foot-fault, set point, return, advantage Snooker : nothing Chess : chess move, checkerboard

Is an HTML5 <header> tag unnecessary if there is only a single <hx> tag inside it? [closed]

由 China☆狼群 提交于 2019-11-27 04:52:04
问题 Closed . This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers. Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post. Closed 5 years ago . I've searched and have not come up with any useful answers, so here goes: Is an HTML5 <header> tag unnecessary if there is only a single <hx> tag inside it? For instance, I have the following HTML5 markup: <article> <header> <h1>Heading Title</h1> </header> ... </article>

Semantically, which is more correct: a in h2, or h2 in a?

由 ℡╲_俬逩灬. 提交于 2019-11-27 04:27:34
I'm stuck deciding which to use as both seem to work. Should I be placing links <a> inside of <h2> elements? Or the other way around? What is the correct standard? You can only place <h2> elements within <a> elements if you're working with HTML5, which allows any other elements within <a> elements . Previous specifications (or current ones however you want to look at them) never allowed this. The usual way of doing this is to place <a> within <h2> . This works, has always worked, and has been the only valid way to do it before HTML5, for heading links, as the link refers to the text in that

cudaMemset() - does it set bytes or integers?

由 江枫思渺然 提交于 2019-11-27 03:28:23
问题 From online documentation: cudaError_t cudaMemset (void * devPtr, int value, size_t count ) Fills the first count bytes of the memory area pointed to by devPtr with the constant byte value value. Parameters: devPtr - Pointer to device memory value - Value to set for each byte of specified memory count - Size in bytes to set This description doesn't appear to be correct as: int *dJunk; cudaMalloc((void**)&dJunk, 32*(sizeof(int)); cudaMemset(dJunk, 0x12, 32); will set all 32 integers to 0x12,

Finding the id of a parent div using Jquery

由 元气小坏坏 提交于 2019-11-27 02:37:30
I have some html like this: <div id="1"> <p> Volume = <input type="text" /> <button rel="3.93e-6" class="1" type="button">Check answer</button> </p> <div></div> </div> and some JS like this: $("button").click(function () { var buttonNo = $(this).attr('class'); var correct = Number($(this).attr('rel')); validate (Number($("#"+buttonNo+" input").val()),correct); $("#"+buttonNo+" div").html(feedback); }); What I'd really like is if I didn't have to have the class="1" on the button (I know numeric classes aren't valid, but this is a WIP!), so I could determine buttonNo based on the id of the

Should I force Python type checking?

由 怎甘沉沦 提交于 2019-11-27 02:17:32
问题 Perhaps as a remnant of my days with a strongly-typed language (Java), I often find myself writing functions and then forcing type checks. For example: def orSearch(d, query): assert (type(d) == dict) assert (type(query) == list) Should I keep doing this? what are the advantages to doing/not doing this? 回答1: Stop doing that. The point of using a "dynamic" language (that is strongly typed as to values*, untyped as to variables, and late bound) is that your functions can be properly polymorphic

What happens to you if you break the monad laws?

由 谁说我不能喝 提交于 2019-11-27 01:13:56
问题 Do the compiler or the more "native" parts of the libraries (IO or functions that have access to black magic and the implementation) make assumptions about these laws? Will breaking them cause the impossible to happen? Or do they just express a programming pattern -- ie, the only person you'll annoy by breaking them are people who use your code and didn't expect you to be so careless? 回答1: The compiler doesn't make any assumptions about the laws, however, if your instance does not obey the

The concept of Bottom in Haskell

由 人盡茶涼 提交于 2019-11-27 00:58:45
问题 Bottom in Haskell described here is said to be any computation that have errors, is unterminated, or involves infinite loop, is of any type... is this specific to Haskell? We know in Lattice theory, there is also a notion of Bottom there.....and shouldn't Bottom be defined based on what's the order defined? 回答1: Indeed there is an order of definedness , where bottom is the least defined value. Have a look at this page about denotational semantics in Haskell for a more thorough explanation.

Javascript: difference between a statement and an expression?

由 …衆ロ難τιáo~ 提交于 2019-11-27 00:05:50
问题 I asked this question earlier, and after thinking about the topic some more, I began to wonder where the seemingly fuzzy boundary between the meanings of the terms "statement" and "expression" lies. Are all statements also expressions? Where do the return values in a REPL console come from? They don't always seem to make any intuitive sense. Of course if you type 1+1 , you'll get 2 , but other times it isn't as obvious what the logic is. Given that anything typed into REPL produces some value

Python: Semantic similarity score for Strings [duplicate]

由 人走茶凉 提交于 2019-11-27 00:00:34
问题 This question already has an answer here: How to compute the similarity between two text documents? 9 answers Are there any libraries for computing semantic similarity scores for a pair of sentences ? I'm aware of WordNet's semantic database, and how I can generate the score for 2 words, but I'm looking for libraries that do all pre-processing tasks like port-stemming, stop word removal, etc, on whole sentences and outputs a score for how related the two sentences are. I found a work in
订阅 semantics