scipy

What is the theory behind the odeintw package for complex matrix differential equations?

帅比萌擦擦* 提交于 2021-02-08 09:53:38
问题 In most of the below answers for complex matrix differential equations, the odeintw package has been suggested. https://stackoverflow.com/a/45970853/7952027 https://stackoverflow.com/a/26320130/7952027 https://stackoverflow.com/a/26747232/7952027 https://stackoverflow.com/a/26582411/7952027 I want to know the theory behind the manipulations done in the code of odeintw. Like why one has to build that banded jacobian, the idea behind the functions _complex_to_real_jac, _transform_banded_jac,

Behaviour of affine transform on 3D image with non-uniform resolution with Scipy

孤街浪徒 提交于 2021-02-08 08:43:18
问题 I'm looking to apply an affine transformation, defined in homogeneous coordinates on images of different resolutions, but I encounter an issue when one ax is of different resolution of the others. Normally, as only the translation part of the affine is dependent of the resolution, I normalize the translation part by the resolution and apply the corresponding affine on the image, using scipy.ndimage.affine_transform. If the resolution of the image is the same for all axes, it works perfectly,

Inconsistent skewness results between basic skewness formula, Python and R

白昼怎懂夜的黑 提交于 2021-02-08 07:54:47
问题 The data I'm using is pasted below. When I apply the basic formula for skewness to my data in R: 3*(mean(data) - median(data))/sd(data) The result is -0.07949198. I get a very similar result in Python. The median is therefore greater than the mean suggesting the left tail is longer. However, when I apply the descdist function from the fitdistrplus package, the skewness is 0.3076471 suggesting the right tail is longer. The Scipy function skew again returns a skewness of 0.303. Can I trust this

Generate a B-Spline basis in SciPy, like bs() in R

北城余情 提交于 2021-02-08 07:39:09
问题 With N 1-dimensional data X, I would like to evaluate each point at K cubic B-splines. In R, there is a simple function with an intuitive API, called bs. There is actually a python package patsy which replicates this, but I can't use that package -- only scipy and such. Having looked through the scipy.interpolate documentation on spline-related functions, the closest I can find is BSpline, or BSpline.basis_element, but how to get just the K basis functions is totally mysterious to me. I tried

Generate a B-Spline basis in SciPy, like bs() in R

廉价感情. 提交于 2021-02-08 07:38:42
问题 With N 1-dimensional data X, I would like to evaluate each point at K cubic B-splines. In R, there is a simple function with an intuitive API, called bs. There is actually a python package patsy which replicates this, but I can't use that package -- only scipy and such. Having looked through the scipy.interpolate documentation on spline-related functions, the closest I can find is BSpline, or BSpline.basis_element, but how to get just the K basis functions is totally mysterious to me. I tried

How to fit non-linear data's in python

↘锁芯ラ 提交于 2021-02-08 07:38:35
问题 How to fit a non linear data's using scipy.optimize import curve_fit in Python using following 3 methods: Gaussian. Lorentz fit. Langmuir fit. I am just able to link and plot from my data file. from matplotlib import pyplot as plt from matplotlib import style import numpy as np import pylab from scipy.optimize import curve_fit style.use('ggplot') data = np.genfromtxt('D:\csvtrail3.csv', delimiter=',', skiprows=1) x=data[:,0] y=data[:,1] data.fit_lorentzians() plt.plot(x, y) plt.title('Epic

One end clamped and other end free cubic spline using scipy.interpolate.splprep and splev

旧时模样 提交于 2021-02-08 07:25:44
问题 I have the following data: x_old = [ 0.00000000e+00, -5.96880765e-24, -8.04361605e-23, -2.11167774e-22, -2.30386081e-22, -7.86854147e-23, 1.17548440e-22, 1.93009272e-22, 1.49906866e-22, 9.66877465e-23, 1.48495705e-23] y_old = [ 0. , 0.03711505, 0.03780602, 0.02524459, 0.01349815, 0.00964215, 0.00972842, 0.0168793 , 0.02577024, 0.02761626, 0.02141961] z_old = [ 0. , 0.29834302, 0.59805918, 0.89773519, 1.19755092, 1.49749325, 1.79750314, 2.09741402, 2.39727031, 2.69726787, 2.99719479] I want to

One end clamped and other end free cubic spline using scipy.interpolate.splprep and splev

会有一股神秘感。 提交于 2021-02-08 07:25:30
问题 I have the following data: x_old = [ 0.00000000e+00, -5.96880765e-24, -8.04361605e-23, -2.11167774e-22, -2.30386081e-22, -7.86854147e-23, 1.17548440e-22, 1.93009272e-22, 1.49906866e-22, 9.66877465e-23, 1.48495705e-23] y_old = [ 0. , 0.03711505, 0.03780602, 0.02524459, 0.01349815, 0.00964215, 0.00972842, 0.0168793 , 0.02577024, 0.02761626, 0.02141961] z_old = [ 0. , 0.29834302, 0.59805918, 0.89773519, 1.19755092, 1.49749325, 1.79750314, 2.09741402, 2.39727031, 2.69726787, 2.99719479] I want to

How to monitor the process of SciPy.odeint?

拜拜、爱过 提交于 2021-02-08 07:21:27
问题 SciPy can solve ode equations by scipy.integrate.odeint or other packages, but it gives result after the function has been solved completely. However, if the ode function is very complex, the program will take a lot of time(one or two days) to give the whole result. So how can I mointor the step it solve the equations(print out result when the equation hasn't been solved completely)? 回答1: You could split the integration domain and integrate the segments, taking the last value of the previous

How to monitor the process of SciPy.odeint?

有些话、适合烂在心里 提交于 2021-02-08 07:20:27
问题 SciPy can solve ode equations by scipy.integrate.odeint or other packages, but it gives result after the function has been solved completely. However, if the ode function is very complex, the program will take a lot of time(one or two days) to give the whole result. So how can I mointor the step it solve the equations(print out result when the equation hasn't been solved completely)? 回答1: You could split the integration domain and integrate the segments, taking the last value of the previous